These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29285725)

  • 21. Influence of iterative image reconstruction on CT-based calcium score measurements.
    van Osch JA; Mouden M; van Dalen JA; Timmer JR; Reiffers S; Knollema S; Greuter MJ; Ottervanger JP; Jager PL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 30(5):961-7. PubMed ID: 24676668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of iterative reconstruction algorithms on machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR
    Li S; Chen C; Qin L; Gu S; Zhang H; Yan F; Yang W
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 32130576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Fukumoto W; Kaichi Y; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Kihara Y; Awai K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31(5):1045-52. PubMed ID: 25754302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT.
    Gebhard C; Fiechter M; Fuchs TA; Ghadri JR; Herzog BA; Kuhn F; Stehli J; Müller E; Kazakauskaite E; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(6):2932-7. PubMed ID: 22959869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study.
    den Harder AM; Willemink MJ; Bleys RL; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Schilham AM; Leiner T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 30(6):1125-33. PubMed ID: 24794292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of Deep Learning Based Image Reconstruction on Quantitative Results of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.
    Klemenz AC; Beckert L; Manzke M; Lang CI; Weber MA; Meinel FG
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):2259-2267. PubMed ID: 38582685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correction Factors for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Instead of Filtered Back Projection.
    Caruso D; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Felmly LM; Varga-Szemes A; Mangold S; Canstein C; Allmendinger T; Fuller SR; Laghi A; Wichmann JL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1480-1489. PubMed ID: 27614365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis.
    den Harder AM; Wolterink JM; Willemink MJ; Schilham AMR; de Jong PA; Budde RPJ; Nathoe HM; Išgum I; Leiner T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2152-2159. PubMed ID: 27776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium on Low-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Iterative Reconstruction.
    Braber TL; Willemink MJ; Bohté EH; Mosterd A; Leiner T; Velthuis BK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 26720203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dose reduction for CT coronary calcium scoring with a calcium-aware image reconstruction technique: a phantom study.
    Booij R; van der Werf NR; Budde RPJ; Bos D; van Straten M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3346-3355. PubMed ID: 32072259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography.
    Yuki H; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Tokuyasu S; Namimoto T; Hirai T; Itatani R; Katahira K; Oshima S; Yamashita Y
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 24661824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual estimation of coronary calcium on computed tomography for attenuation correction.
    Engbers EM; Timmer JR; Mouden M; Jager PL; Knollema S; Oostdijk AH; Ottervanger JP
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 27089854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring with tube current reduction by 75%, using an adaptive iterative reconstruction algorithm.
    Luhur R; Schuijf JD; Mews J; Blobel J; Hamm B; Lembcke A
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170678. PubMed ID: 29260893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of ultra-low-dose CT for the evaluation of coronary calcification: a direct comparison with coronary calcium score.
    Silveira de Souza VV; Soares Torres F; Hochhegger B; Watte G; Sartori G; Lucchese F; Azambuja Gonçalves B
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):745-750. PubMed ID: 28413071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study.
    McQuiston AD; Muscogiuri G; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Canstein C; Varga-Szemes A; Cannao' PM; Wichmann JL; Allmendinger T; Vliegenthart R; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26724647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection].
    Murazaki H; Funama Y; Hatemura M; Fujioka C; Tomiguchi S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 21532246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Influence of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Phantom and Clinical Studies.
    Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Yuki H; Kidoh M; Hirata K; Taguchi N; Honda K; Takaoka H; Iyama Y; Katahira K; Noda K; Oshima S; Tokuyasu S; Yamashita Y
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 27913107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison between filtered-back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction techniques.
    Otgonbaatar C; Jeon PH; Ryu JK; Shim H; Jeon SH; Ko SM; Kim H
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Aug; 64(8):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 37211615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) on coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Rossi A; Gennari AG; Etter D; Benz DC; Sartoretti T; Giannopoulos AA; Mikail N; Bengs S; Maurer A; Gebhard C; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA; Fuchs TA; Messerli M
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):3832-3838. PubMed ID: 36480026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Controversies about effects of low-kilovoltage MDCT acquisition on Agatston calcium scoring.
    Deprez FC; Vlassenbroek A; Ghaye B; Raaijmakers R; Coche E
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 23333185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.