147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29286184)
1. In vitro biofilm growth on modern voice prostheses.
Leonhard M; Zatorska B; Tan Y; Moser D; Schneider-Stickler B
Head Neck; 2018 Apr; 40(4):763-769. PubMed ID: 29286184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses.
Kress P; Schäfer P; Schwerdtfeger FP; Rösler S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 23812585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical use of a voice prosthesis with a flap valve containing silver oxide (Blom-Singer Advantage), biofilm formation, in-situ lifetime and indication].
Kress P; Schäfer P; Schwerdtfeger FP
Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Dec; 85(12):893-6. PubMed ID: 16612757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of biofilm formation on new Phonax and Provox 2 voice prostheses - a pilot study.
Leonhard M; Moser D; Reumueller A; Mancusi G; Bigenzahn W; Schneider-Stickler B
Head Neck; 2010 Jul; 32(7):886-95. PubMed ID: 19862824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofilm in voice prosthesis: A prospective cohort study and laboratory tests using sonication and SEM analysis.
Galli J; Calo L; Meucci D; Giuliani M; Lucidi D; Paludetti G; Torelli R; Sanguinetti M; Parrilla C
Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 43(5):1260-1265. PubMed ID: 29768730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The costs for different voice prostheses depending on the lifetime].
Schuldt T; Ovari A; Dommerich S
Laryngorhinootologie; 2013 Jun; 92(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 23670563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofilm formation and design features of indwelling silicone rubber tracheoesophageal voice prostheses--an electron microscopical study.
Leunisse C; van Weissenbruch R; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Dijk F; Albers FW
J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 11505431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biofilm formation on the Provox ActiValve: Composition and ingrowth analyzed by Illumina paired-end RNA sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Timmermans AJ; Harmsen HJ; Bus-Spoor C; Buijssen KJ; van As-Brooks C; de Goffau MC; Tonk RH; van den Brekel MW; Hilgers FJ; van der Laan BF
Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38 Suppl 1():E432-40. PubMed ID: 25641597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a magnet-based valve voice prosthesis for endoprosthesis leakage treatment.
Mayo-Yáñez M; Chiesa-Estomba C; Lechien JR; Calvo-Henríquez C; Vaira LA; Cabo-Varela I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 279(8):4167-4172. PubMed ID: 35217904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].
Schäfer P; Klützke N; Schwerdtfeger FP
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Nov; 80(11):677-81. PubMed ID: 11702284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Candida biofilm formation on Provox 2 and Provox Acti Valve voice prosthesis].
Nowak M; Kurnatowski P
Otolaryngol Pol; 2010; 64(6):358-64. PubMed ID: 21302502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The artificial throat: a new method for standardization of in vitro experiments with tracheo-oesophageal voice prostheses.
Leunisse C; van Weissenbruch R; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Albers FW
Acta Otolaryngol; 1999; 119(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 10478604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized comparative study of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: Blom-Singer versus Provox.
Delsupehe K; Zink I; Lejaegere M; Delaere P
Laryngoscope; 1998 Oct; 108(10):1561-5. PubMed ID: 9778302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Growth Media for Mixed Multispecies Oropharyngeal Biofilm Compositions on Silicone.
Leonhard M; Zatorska B; Moser D; Schneider-Stickler B
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8051270. PubMed ID: 31360725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term results of Provox ActiValve, solving the problem of frequent candida- and "underpressure"-related voice prosthesis replacements.
Soolsma J; van den Brekel MW; Ackerstaff AH; Balm AJ; Tan B; Hilgers FJ
Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 18090869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.
Schwandt LQ; Tjong-Ayong HJ; van Weissenbruch R; der Mei HC; Albers FW
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 263(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 16421748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical phase I/feasibility study of the next generation indwelling Provox voice prosthesis (Provox Vega).
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; van Rossum M; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 19895334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new problem-solving indwelling voice prosthesis, eliminating the need for frequent Candida- and "underpressure"-related replacements: Provox ActiValve.
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; Balm AJ; Van den Brekel MW; Bing Tan I; Persson JO
Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Oct; 123(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 14606602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience.
Ramalingam W; Chikara D; Rajagopal G; Mehta AR; Sarkar S
Med J Armed Forces India; 2007 Jan; 63(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 27407929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biofilm formation on voice prostheses: influence of dairy products in vitro.
Free RH; Van der Mei HC; Dijk F; Van Weissenbruch R; Busscher HJ; Albers FW
Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Jan; 120(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 10779194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
