265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29286616)
1. Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators.
Ashokkumar S; Ganesh KM; Ramalingam K; Karthikeyan K; Jagadheeskumar N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3439-3444. PubMed ID: 29286616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of identical VMAT plans with and without jaw tracking technique.
Wu H; Jiang F; Yue H; Hu Q; Zhang J; Liu Z; Gong J; Li S; Geng J; Zhang Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):133-141. PubMed ID: 27685122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method for selecting reference beam model of VMAT plans with three 6MV beam-matched linear accelerators during radiation oncology.
Li Y; Wu W; Yuan W; Chai L; Tang F; He R; Lu Y; Zhang Y; Lu Y; Wang L; Wang M; Zhang X; Zhang L
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10131. PubMed ID: 37349531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of beam-matched linacs quality/accuracy for interchanging SBRT or SRT patient using VMAT without replanning.
Xu Z; Warrell G; Lee S; Colussi V; Zheng Y; Ellis R; Machtay M; Podder T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 30402983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rounded leaf end modeling in Pinnacle VMAT treatment planning for fixed jaw linacs.
Young LA; Yang F; Cao N; Meyer J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):149-162. PubMed ID: 27929490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DVH analysis using a transmission detector and model-based dose verification system as a comprehensive pretreatment QA tool for VMAT plans: Clinical experience and results.
Mohamed Yoosuf AB; AlShehri S; Alhadab A; Alqathami M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):80-87. PubMed ID: 31605456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and clinical evaluation of an ionization chamber array with 3.5 mm pixel pitch for quality assurance in advanced radiotherapy techniques.
Togno M; Wilkens JJ; Menichelli D; Oechsner M; Perez-Andujar A; Morin O
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2283. PubMed ID: 27147340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and IMRT/VMAT delivery quality of a preconfigured fast-rotating O-ring linac system.
De Roover R; Crijns W; Poels K; Michiels S; Nulens A; Vanstraelen B; Petillion S; De Brabandere M; Haustermans K; Depuydt T
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):328-339. PubMed ID: 30417523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of beam matching accuracy among six linacs from the same vendor.
Krishnappan C; Radha CA; Balaji K; Mani PK; Subramani V; Thanigaimalai V; Gunasekaran MK; Ramasubramanian V
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):423-433. PubMed ID: 30269310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Assessment of Dosimetric Characteristics of Inline 2.5 Mega Voltage Unflattened Imaging X-Ray Beam.
Rajamanickam T; Muthu S; Murugan P; Dinesan C; Mekala C; Senthilnathan K; Arunai Nambi Raj N; Ramesh Babu P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Aug; 20(8):2531-2539. PubMed ID: 31450929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity of IROC phantom performance to radiotherapy treatment planning system beam modeling parameters based on community-driven data.
Glenn MC; Peterson CB; Howell RM; Followill DS; Pollard-Larkin JM; Kry SF
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5250-5259. PubMed ID: 32677052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commissioning measurements for photon beam data on three TrueBeam linear accelerators, and comparison with Trilogy and Clinac 2100 linear accelerators.
Beyer GP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4077. PubMed ID: 23318395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of small MU/segment and dose rate on delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Huang L; Zhuang T; Mastroianni A; Djemil T; Cui T; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 27167278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric validation and clinical implementation of two 3D dose verification systems for quality assurance in volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques.
Clemente-Gutiérrez F; Pérez-Vara C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5190. PubMed ID: 26103189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commissioning and dosimetric characteristics of TrueBeam system: composite data of three TrueBeam machines.
Chang Z; Wu Q; Adamson J; Ren L; Bowsher J; Yan H; Thomas A; Yin FF
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6981-7018. PubMed ID: 23127092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
