These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2928763)
1. Fraud in science: causes and remedies. Relman AS Sci Am; 1989 Apr; 260(4):126. PubMed ID: 2928763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fraud in scientific research: of forging, cooking, and trimming. MD; 1982 Jun; 26(7):188-95, 199, 203 passim. PubMed ID: 10255662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research fraud often goes undetected. Holthaus D Hospitals; 1988 Nov; 62(21):87. PubMed ID: 3181902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Congress explores the incidence of scientific fraud and misconduct. Harby K J Nucl Med; 1988 Sep; 29(9):1469-71. PubMed ID: 3411371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case. Anderson A Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):504. PubMed ID: 3200292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New round in Dingell v. NIH? Palca J Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4916):349. PubMed ID: 2783238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH report not the final word on Baltimore case. Swinbanks D Nature; 1989 Feb; 337(6207):490. PubMed ID: 2915696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud review may be taken from NIH. Culliton BJ Science; 1989 Mar; 243(4898):1545. PubMed ID: 2928787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US congressional committee takes on role of reviewer. Anderson A Nature; 1988 Apr; 332(6166):670. PubMed ID: 3357524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]