These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29287658)

  • 1. Assessment of the rate of premolar extraction space closure in the maxillary arch with the AcceleDent Aura appliance vs no appliance in adolescents: A single-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Miles P; Fisher E; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 29287658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the changes in arch perimeter and irregularity in the mandibular arch during initial alignment with the AcceleDent Aura appliance vs no appliance in adolescents: A single-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Miles P; Fisher E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):928-936. PubMed ID: 27894541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of supplemental vibrational force on space closure, treatment duration, and occlusal outcome: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    DiBiase AT; Woodhouse NR; Papageorgiou SN; Johnson N; Slipper C; Grant J; Alsaleh M; Khaja Y; Cobourne MT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):469-480.e4. PubMed ID: 29602338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of occlusal outcome following space closure in cases of lower second premolar aplasia using lingual orthodontic molar mesialization without maxillary counterbalancing extraction.
    Klang E; Beyling F; Knösel M; Wiechmann D
    Head Face Med; 2018 Sep; 14(1):17. PubMed ID: 30249268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the bracket-ligature combination affect the amount of orthodontic space closure over three months? A randomized controlled trial.
    Wong H; Collins J; Tinsley D; Sandler J; Benson P
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 23794696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic space closure investigated over 12 weeks: a split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Li J; Papadopoulou AK; Gandedkar N; Dalci K; Darendeliler MA; Dalci O
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Aug; 44(4):427-435. PubMed ID: 35134142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of rate of orthodontic tooth movement in adolescent patients undergoing treatment by first bicuspid extraction and en-mass retraction, associated with low level laser therapy in passive self-ligating and conventional brackets: A randomized controlled trial.
    Lalnunpuii H; Batra P; Sharma K; Srivastava A; Raghavan S
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):412-423. PubMed ID: 32571649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of supplemental vibrational force on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    DiBiase AT; Woodhouse NR; Papageorgiou SN; Johnson N; Slipper C; Grant J; Alsaleh M; Cobourne MT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):918-927. PubMed ID: 27894540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
    Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of maxillary incisors' retraction in orthodontic space closure: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Mordente CM; Oliveira DD; Palomo JM; Cardoso PA; Assis MAL; Zenóbio EG; Souki BQ; Soares RV
    Prog Orthod; 2024 Feb; 25(1):6. PubMed ID: 38342823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction.
    Metzner R; Schwestka-Polly R; Helms HJ; Wiechmann D
    Head Face Med; 2015 Jun; 11():22. PubMed ID: 26092262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 3: premolar extraction patients.
    Baldwin DK; King G; Ramsay DS; Huang G; Bollen AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):837-45. PubMed ID: 18538247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A segmented appliance for space closure followed by Invisalign and fixed appliances.
    Uribe F; Cutrera A; Nanda R
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 22299111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthodontic space closure in combination with membrane supported healing of extraction sockets (MHE) a pilot study.
    Tiefengraber J; Diedrich P; Fritz U; Lantos P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2002 Sep; 63(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 12297969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Space closure using the Hycon device. A case report.
    Kachiwala VA; Kalha AS; Vigneshwaran J
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 17679539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue treatment changes with fixed functional appliances and with maxillary premolar extraction in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients.
    Janson G; Castello Branco N; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Henriques JFC; de Morais JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Apr; 40(2):214-222. PubMed ID: 29016727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of orthodontic space closure using micro-osteoperforation and passive self-ligating appliances or conventional fixed appliances.
    Mittal R; Attri S; Batra P; Sonar S; Sharma K; Raghavan S
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):634-639. PubMed ID: 33378478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-invasive maxillary anchorage for canine retraction in premolar extraction cases.
    Magness WB
    J Clin Orthod; 2006 Oct; 40(10):594-8; quiz 599. PubMed ID: 17062911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.