These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29287717)
1. Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer. Yim GW; Eoh KJ; Chung YS; Kim SW; Kim S; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim YT J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 29287717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer. Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study. Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes. Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study. Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report. Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States. Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure? Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study. Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Luo C; Liu M; Li X BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes. Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy. Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy. Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Radical Parametrectomy With Upper Vaginectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Occult Cervical Carcinoma After Extrafascial Hysterectomy. Tran AQ; Sullivan SA; Gehrig PA; Soper JT; Boggess JF; Kim KH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):757-763. PubMed ID: 28254677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting. Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic single-port hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Yoon A; Yoo HN; Lee YY; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS; Kim TJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):322. PubMed ID: 25499776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]