249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29287717)
1. Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Yim GW; Eoh KJ; Chung YS; Kim SW; Kim S; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim YT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 29287717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report.
Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Radical Parametrectomy With Upper Vaginectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Occult Cervical Carcinoma After Extrafascial Hysterectomy.
Tran AQ; Sullivan SA; Gehrig PA; Soper JT; Boggess JF; Kim KH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):757-763. PubMed ID: 28254677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic single-port hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Yoon A; Yoo HN; Lee YY; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS; Kim TJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):322. PubMed ID: 25499776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
