These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29288067)

  • 1. Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.
    Morgan DM; Kamdar NS; Swenson CW; Kobernik EK; Sammarco AG; Nallamothu B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):425.e1-425.e18. PubMed ID: 29288067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.
    Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open vs. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Commercially Insured Costs and Readmissions.
    Fitch K; Huh W; Bochner A
    Manag Care; 2016 Aug; 25(8):40-47. PubMed ID: 28121585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in hysterectomy rates among women veterans in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
    Katon JG; Gray K; Callegari L; Gardella C; Gibson C; Ma E; Lynch KE; Zephyrin L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):428.e1-428.e11. PubMed ID: 28578175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal trend and nationwide utility for hysterectomies in Taiwan, 1997-2010.
    Huang WY; Huang KH; Chang WC; Wu SC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):659-665. PubMed ID: 27751412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010.
    Lee J; Jennings K; Borahay MA; Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Snyder RR; Patel PR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):656-61. PubMed ID: 24462854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
    Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Dandolu V; Pathak P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Change in Surgical Practice for Women With Leiomyomas After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellator Safety Communication.
    Clark NM; Schembri M; Jacoby VL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 29016511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.
    Huang CC; Lo TS; Huang YT; Long CY; Law KS; Wu MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):65-73.e1. PubMed ID: 30928611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.
    Harris JA; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Mahnert N; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):98.e1-98.e13. PubMed ID: 26314519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Smorgick N; Patzkowsky KE; Hoffman MR; Advincula AP; Song AH; As-Sanie S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 289(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 23839534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The shift from inpatient to outpatient hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in the United States: trends, enabling factors, cost, and safety.
    Cappuccio S; Li Y; Song C; Liu E; Glaser G; Casarin J; Grassi T; Butler K; Magtibay P; Magrina JF; Scambia G; Mariani A; Langstraat C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 May; 31(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 33727220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nationwide Estimates of Annual Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomies Performed in the United States.
    Wright JD; Huang Y; Li AH; Melamed A; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 139(3):446-448. PubMed ID: 35115477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Culture-Confirmed
    Rashid N; Begier E; Lin KJ; Yu H
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2020 Mar; 21(2):169-178. PubMed ID: 31580776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997.
    Farquhar CM; Steiner CA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 11814502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hysterectomies in Portugal (2000-2014): What has changed?
    Gante I; Medeiros-Borges C; Águas F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():97-102. PubMed ID: 27914240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in various types of surgery for hysterectomy and distribution by patient age, surgeon age, and hospital accreditation: 10-year population-based study in Taiwan.
    Wu MP; Huang KH; Long CY; Tsai EM; Tang CH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):612-9. PubMed ID: 20656565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.