These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29288067)

  • 21. Risk of Undetected Cancer at the Time of Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Implications for the Use of Power Morcellation.
    Perkins RB; Handal-Orefice R; Hanchate AD; Lin M; Paasche-Orlow MK
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 26701205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
    Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
    JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies in private practice and visiting professorship programs.
    Phillips DR; Nathanson HG; Milim SJ; Haselkorn JS
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 Nov; 3(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9050616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Psychiatric inpatient, outpatient, and medication utilization and costs among privately insured youths, 1997-2000.
    Martin A; Leslie D
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Apr; 160(4):757-64. PubMed ID: 12668366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures.
    Becker ER
    J Health Care Finance; 2007; 33(3):1-16. PubMed ID: 19175228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008-2014.
    Moawad G; Liu E; Song C; Fu AZ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188812. PubMed ID: 29190666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.
    Veerus P; Lang K; Toompere K; Kirss F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25711677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trends in laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy in Korea between 2007 and 2009.
    Lee EJ; Park HM
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1695-9. PubMed ID: 24888936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Procedural volume, cost, and reimbursement of outpatient incisional hernia repair: implications for payers and providers.
    Song C; Liu E; Tackett S; Shi L; Marcus D
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):623-632. PubMed ID: 28277031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changing hysterectomy technique from open abdominal to laparoscopic: new trend in Oslo, Norway.
    Istre O; Langebrekke A; Qvigstad E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 17218234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outpatient laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Galen DI; Jacobson A; Weckstein LN
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 May; 1(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 9050494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications.
    Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Spence AR; Gotlieb WH; Abenhaim HA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):665.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26188114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hysterectomy surveillance--United States, 1980-1993.
    Lepine LA; Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA; Koonin LM; Morrow B; Kieke BA; Wilcox LS
    MMWR CDC Surveill Summ; 1997 Aug; 46(4):1-15. PubMed ID: 9259214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trends of Bilateral Salpingectomy During Vaginal Hysterectomy With and Without Laparoscopic Assistance Performed for Benign Indications in the United States.
    Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Wyman A; Salihu HM; Imudia AN; Hart S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1063-1069.e1. PubMed ID: 27448507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting.
    Summitt RL; Stovall TG; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):895-901. PubMed ID: 1448255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Average charges for three types of hysterectomy procedures: United States, 1998.
    Mushinski M
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 2000; 81(2):27-36. PubMed ID: 10802878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Out-of-network bills among privately insured patients undergoing hysterectomy.
    Albright BB; Chen L; Havrilesky LJ; Moss HA; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 226(4):543.e1-543.e45. PubMed ID: 34774823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inpatient surgical treatment patterns for patients with uterine fibroids in the United States, 1998-2002.
    Becker ER; Spalding J; DuChane J; Horowitz IR
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2005 Oct; 97(10):1336-42. PubMed ID: 16353655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Economic Evaluation of Global Endometrial Ablation Versus Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy for Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: US Commercial and Medicaid Payer Perspectives.
    Miller JD; Bonafede MM; Cai Q; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Cholkeri-Singh A
    Popul Health Manag; 2018 Mar; 21(S1):S1-S12. PubMed ID: 29570003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.