160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29288346)
21. Comparison of surgical and postoperative complications of vaginal hysterectomy and Manchester procedure.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Kalogirou O
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 8856304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. A comparison.
Thomas AG; Brodman ML; Dottino PR; Bodian C; Friedman F; Bogursky E
J Reprod Med; 1995 Apr; 40(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 7623360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Back to the future: vaginal hysterectomy and Campbell uterosacral ligaments suspension for urogenital prolapse.
Pettenati C; Cour F; Bosset PO; Kennel T; Vidart A; Lebret T
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 33620535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study.
Vermeulen CKM; Veen J; Adang C; van Leijsen SAL; Coolen AWM; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):841-850. PubMed ID: 33170314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher.
Stoter LM; Notten KJB; Claas M; Tijsseling D; Ruefli M; van den Tillaart F; van Kuijk SMJ; Milani AL; Kluivers KB
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 May; 35(5):985-993. PubMed ID: 38416155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy vs. Uterosacral Suspension for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Assessment.
Al-Badr A; Perveen K; Al-Shaikh G
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2017 Jan; 9(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 28120442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse using validated questionnaires: 2-year prospective study.
Lone F; Curnow T; Thomas SA
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 28687905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study.
Husby KR; Larsen MD; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 32897459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Mukwege AA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Rhodes DJ; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):803-810. PubMed ID: 28921036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse.
Diwan A; Rardin CR; Strohsnitter WC; Weld A; Rosenblatt P; Kohli N
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jan; 17(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15997364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the Kelly's plication and TOT simultaneously with vaginal hysterectomy, on the incontinence, and sexual functions.
Tepe NB; Bayrak O; Ozcan HC; Ugur MG; Seckiner I
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(4):779-784. PubMed ID: 29757572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse: a single center retrospective study.
Kim JH; Lee SY; Chae HD; Shin YK; Lee SR; Kim SH
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2022 Jan; 65(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 34736315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension or Uphold™ hysteropexy in women with apical prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Kulkarni M; Young N; Lee J; Rosamilia A
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2137-2146. PubMed ID: 32468174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery after native tissue vault suspension at hysterectomy-A prospective cohort study.
Bonde L; Østergaard L; Fosbøl EL; Møller LA; Ottesen B; Gislason GH; Gimbel H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():144-150. PubMed ID: 31284088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Bradley MS; Sridhar A; Ferrante K; Andy UU; Visco AG; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Myers D; Varner E; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG;
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):479-488. PubMed ID: 36701331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Impact of sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension on the anterior compartment].
Benedito de Castro E; Palma P; Riccetto C; Herrmann V; Bigozzi MA; Olivares JM
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 20223141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Uterosacral-cardinal ligament stretching prior to vaginal hysterectomy increases uterine descent: a novel technique.
Krissi H; Eitan R; Goldchmit C; Peled Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jan; 160(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 22169812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
