BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29288653)

  • 21. Patients' satisfaction following laparoscopic cornuectomy for removal of hysteroscopic sterilization devices.
    Eychenne C; Vidal F; Weyl A; Guerby P; Vaysse C; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Parant O; Siebert T
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 50(3):101939. PubMed ID: 33049363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tubal sterilization and long-term risk of hysterectomy: findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
    Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA; Tylor LR; Peterson HB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):609-14. PubMed ID: 9083322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
    Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intrauterine Contraception and Tubal Ligation.
    Schwarz EB; Lewis CA; Dove MS; Murphy E; Zuckerman D; Nunez-Eddy C; Tancredi DJ; McDonald-Mosley R; Sonalkar S; Hathaway M; Gariepy AM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Dec; 37(16):4168-4175. PubMed ID: 35194746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Probability of pregnancy after sterilization: a comparison of hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization.
    Gariepy AM; Creinin MD; Smith KJ; Xu X
    Contraception; 2014 Aug; 90(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24767963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of adverse events with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.
    Al-Safi ZA; Shavell VI; Hobson DT; Berman JM; Diamond MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 24183273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient Outcomes Following Injury from Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Sills ES; Dalton MM
    Surg Technol Int; 2016 Apr; 28():165-9. PubMed ID: 27042777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pain associated with hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Syed R; Levy J; Childers ME
    JSLS; 2007; 11(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 17651558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal trend in the use of hysteroscopic vs laparoscopic sterilization and the characteristics of commercially insured and Medicaid-insured females in the US who have had the procedures.
    Carney PI; Lin J; Xia F; Law A
    Int J Womens Health; 2016; 8():137-44. PubMed ID: 27257393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England Case-Control Study.
    Rice MS; Murphy MA; Vitonis AF; Cramer DW; Titus LJ; Tworoger SS; Terry KL
    Int J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 133(10):2415-21. PubMed ID: 23650079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Menstrual function after tubal sterilization.
    Wilcox LS; Martinez-Schnell B; Peterson HB; Ware JH; Hughes JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Jun; 135(12):1368-81. PubMed ID: 1510083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
    Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.
    Ozgur K; Bulut H; Berkkanoglu M; Coetzee K; Kaya G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 24813749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in high-risk women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
    Edris F; Vilos GA; Al-Mubarak A; Ettler HC; Hollett-Caines J; Abu-Rafea B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 17218233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term clinical outcomes following resectoscopic endometrial ablation of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
    Vilos GA; Oraif A; Vilos AG; Ettler H; Edris F; Abu-Rafea B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 25048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incidence of hysterectomy and tubal ligation in public hospitals in south Australia, 1980-82.
    Yusuf F; Briggs DK
    J Biosoc Sci; 1988 Oct; 20(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 3192557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of alternative treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding on hysterectomy rates in a tertiary referral center.
    van Dongen H; van de Merwe AG; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 18990612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hysterectomy subsequent to laparoscopic sterilization.
    Kjer JJ; Knudsen L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1990 Apr; 35(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 2138097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study.
    Mao J; Pfeifer S; Schlegel P; Sedrakyan A
    BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5162. PubMed ID: 26462857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.