These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 292887)
1. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee analysis of complaints in 1978. N Z Med J; 1979 Oct; 90(645):305-7. PubMed ID: 292887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical discipline. Medical practitioners Disciplinary Committee. Analysis of complaints investigated in 1979. Richwhite DL N Z Med J; 1980 Sep; 92(668):248-50. PubMed ID: 6935547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee: analysis of complaints for 1982. Richwhite DL N Z Med J; 1983 Nov; 96(743 Pt 2):931-4. PubMed ID: 6579414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The characteristics of doctors receiving medical complaints: a cross-sectional survey of doctors in New Zealand. Cunningham W; Crump R; Tomlin A N Z Med J; 2003 Oct; 116(1183):U625. PubMed ID: 14581939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. General practice: a consumer viewpoint. Richards JG; McPherson MJ N Z Med J; 1982 Apr; 95(705):225-9. PubMed ID: 6953360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee. Shenken L N Z Med J; 1988 Apr; 101(843):181. PubMed ID: 3357630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect on medical practice of disciplinary complaints: potentially negative for patient care. Cunningham W; Dovey S N Z Med J; 2000 Nov; 113(1121):464-7. PubMed ID: 11194753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A complaint following a complaint]. Postema CA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Apr; 135(15):641-3. PubMed ID: 2038377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A marketing analysis of physician selection and patient satisfaction. Glassman M; Glassman N J Health Care Mark; 1981; 1(4):25-31. PubMed ID: 10295154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Manageable evidence in medical care marketing. MacStravic RS J Health Care Mark; 1987 Dec; 7(4):52-9. PubMed ID: 10285779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New Zealand doctors' attitudes towards the complaints and disciplinary process. Cunningham W N Z Med J; 2004 Jul; 117(1198):U973. PubMed ID: 15326496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee--medical certification. N Z Med J; 1987 Apr; 100(822):263-4. PubMed ID: 2970603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigations of complaints and quality of health care. Henderson RF; North N; Patterson G J Law Med; 2005 Feb; 12(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15754558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A patient testifies about costs and competition. Freer G Patient Care; 1979 Sep; 13(15):204-6. PubMed ID: 10243654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of doctor--patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Woolley FR; Kane RL; Hughes CC; Wright DD Soc Sci Med (1967); 1978 Mar; 12(2A):123-8. PubMed ID: 653374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients tell what they think of doctors. Physicians Manage; 1979 Jun; 19(6):26, 31-2. PubMed ID: 10242331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The medical complaints and disciplinary process in New Zealand: doctors' suggestions for change. Cunningham W N Z Med J; 2004 Jul; 117(1198):U974. PubMed ID: 15326497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Independent practice associations in New Zealand: a study of governance structures and process. Kriechbaum A; Crampton P; Dowell A N Z Med J; 2002 Feb; 115(1147):50-2. PubMed ID: 11942516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumers are more willing than ever to switch doctors. Jensen J Mod Healthc; 1989 Nov; 19(47):34. PubMed ID: 10296196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. How do your patients perceive your practice? Thompson MP Colo Med; 1990 Feb; 87(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 2302923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]