These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29289064)

  • 1. Self-masking and overlap-masking from reverberation using the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.
    Al Osman R; Dajani HR; Giguère C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL555. PubMed ID: 29289064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Early- and Late-Arriving Room Reflections on the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.
    Al Osman R; Giguère C; Dajani HR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 29401057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():61-71. PubMed ID: 30921642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Room and head coloration can induce obligatory stream segregation.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 24993189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancement of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms: role of amplitude envelope and temporal fine structure.
    Srinivasan NK; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL239-45. PubMed ID: 24907828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of a speech evoked electrophysiological release from masking in noise.
    Faucette SP; Stuart A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL218. PubMed ID: 28863590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of reverberation on a listener's ability to recognize target sentences in the presence of up to three synchronized masking sentences.
    Abouchacra KS; Besing J; Koehnke J; Letowski T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 21668326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of speech style, room acoustics, and vocal fatigue on vocal effort.
    Bottalico P; Graetzer S; Hunter EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2870. PubMed ID: 27250179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-evoked ABR: Effects of age and simulated neural temporal jitter.
    Mamo SK; Grose JH; Buss E
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():201-209. PubMed ID: 26368029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.
    Zahorik P; Brandewie EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):74. PubMed ID: 27475133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time course of a perceptual enhancement effect for noise-masked speech in reverberant environments.
    Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL265-70. PubMed ID: 23927235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blind single-channel suppression of late reverberation based on perceptual reverberation modeling.
    Tsilfidis A; Mourjopoulos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1439-51. PubMed ID: 21428508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Li X; Jeng FC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing.
    Tierney A; Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):145-50. PubMed ID: 21907782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of stimulus presentation mode and subcortical laterality in speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Ahadi M; Pourbakht A; Jafari AH; Jalaie S
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 24506562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.