These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29289077)
21. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario. Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study. Rönnberg J; Lunner T; Ng EH; Lidestam B; Zekveld AA; Sörqvist P; Lyxell B; Träff U; Yumba W; Classon E; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Signoret C; Pichora-Fuller MK; Rudner M; Danielsson H; Stenfelt S Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):623-42. PubMed ID: 27589015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment. Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids. Ching TY; van Wanrooy E; Dillon H; Carter L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):368-75. PubMed ID: 21303017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing. Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise. Mc Laughlin M; Reilly RB; Zeng FG J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Picou EM; Ricketts TA Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification. Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm. Sabin AT; Souza PE Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):94-107. PubMed ID: 24028890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing. Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Gated auditory speech perception in elderly hearing aid users and elderly normal-hearing individuals: effects of hearing impairment and cognitive capacity. Moradi S; Lidestam B; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J Trends Hear; 2014 Jul; 18():. PubMed ID: 25085610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference? Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss. Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners. Phatak SA; Grant KW J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of Tinnitus and Duration of Deafness on Sound Localization and Speech Recognition in Noise in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness. Liu YW; Cheng X; Chen B; Peng K; Ishiyama A; Fu QJ Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813802. PubMed ID: 30509148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users. Lelic D; Nielsen LLA; Pedersen AK; Neher T Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241246616. PubMed ID: 38656770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users. Li T; Fu QJ Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]