These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29289944)

  • 1. Causal inference from experiment and observation.
    Zwahlen M; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2018 Feb; 21(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 29289944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study.
    Zhang Z; Liu W; Zhang B; Tang L; Zhang J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2053-2066. PubMed ID: 24318273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available.
    Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 183(8):758-64. PubMed ID: 26994063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rectus femoris transfer in children with cerebral palsy: comparing a propensity score-matched observational study to a randomized controlled trial.
    Schwartz MH; Ries AJ
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2021 Feb; 63(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 33084049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Framework for the treatment and reporting of missing data in observational studies: The Treatment And Reporting of Missing data in Observational Studies framework.
    Lee KJ; Tilling KM; Cornish RP; Little RJA; Bell ML; Goetghebeur E; Hogan JW; Carpenter JR;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 134():79-88. PubMed ID: 33539930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Living with observational data in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Aug; 169(4):591-598. PubMed ID: 31132157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relaxed covariate overlap and margin-based causal effect estimation.
    Ghosh D
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4252-4265. PubMed ID: 30168168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observational research--opportunities and limitations.
    Boyko EJ
    J Diabetes Complications; 2013; 27(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 24055326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Squeezing observational data for better causal inference: Methods and examples for prevention research.
    Garcia-Huidobro D; Michael Oakes J
    Int J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 27094382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient Nonparametric Causal Inference with Missing Exposure Information.
    Kennedy EH
    Int J Biostat; 2020 Mar; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 32171000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.
    Candlish J; Teare MD; Dimairo M; Flight L; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 30314463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.
    Desai RJ; Franklin JM
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5657. PubMed ID: 31645336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Why do observational research if there is already a randomised controlled trial?].
    Bossuyt PMM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2020 Aug; 164():. PubMed ID: 32779926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.
    Scott IA; Attia J
    Intern Med J; 2017 Feb; 47(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 27345967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
    Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder.
    Morton SC; Costlow MR; Graff JS; Dubois RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 71():3-10. PubMed ID: 26548541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Observational Studies.
    Robertson SE; Leith A; Schmid CH; Dahabreh IJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 190(6):1088-1100. PubMed ID: 33083822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for multiple imputations in repeated measurements with time-dependent covariates: a case study.
    Tan FES; Jolani S; Verbeek H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():107-114. PubMed ID: 29964148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.