These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29289944)

  • 21. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
    Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder.
    Morton SC; Costlow MR; Graff JS; Dubois RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 71():3-10. PubMed ID: 26548541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Observational Studies.
    Robertson SE; Leith A; Schmid CH; Dahabreh IJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 190(6):1088-1100. PubMed ID: 33083822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A guide to improve your causal inferences from observational data.
    Raymaekers K; Luyckx K; Moons P
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Dec; 19(8):757-762. PubMed ID: 33040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Guidelines for multiple imputations in repeated measurements with time-dependent covariates: a case study.
    Tan FES; Jolani S; Verbeek H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():107-114. PubMed ID: 29964148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Causal Methods for Observational Research: A Primer.
    Almasi-Hashiani A; Nedjat S; Mansournia MA
    Arch Iran Med; 2018 Apr; 21(4):164-169. PubMed ID: 29693407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improper study design precludes valid effect estimates in important suicide prevention research.
    Thorell LH; Wahlin K; Ranstam J
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2019 Sep; 28(3):e1786. PubMed ID: 31144394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.
    Antonelli J; Cefalu M; Palmer N; Agniel D
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 29750844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emulating an RCT in observational research in chest trauma: The target trial approach.
    Cocco AM; Jennings FL; Lockwood D
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(6):951-955. PubMed ID: 34369436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
    Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Doubly-robust estimators of treatment-specific survival distributions in observational studies with stratified sampling.
    Bai X; Tsiatis AA; O'Brien SM
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):830-9. PubMed ID: 24117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.
    Berger ML; Martin BC; Husereau D; Worley K; Allen JD; Yang W; Quon NC; Mullins CD; Kahler KH; Crown W
    Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24636373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methods of Public Health Research - Strengthening Causal Inference from Observational Data.
    Hernán MA
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Oct; 385(15):1345-1348. PubMed ID: 34596980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical effectiveness: an approach to clinical trial design more relevant to clinical practice, acknowledging the importance of individual differences.
    Moore RA; Derry S; McQuay HJ; Straube S; Aldington D; Wiffen P; Bell RF; Kalso E; Rowbotham MC;
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):173-176. PubMed ID: 19748185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Causal Inference From Observational Data: New Guidance From Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Journals.
    Maslove DM; Leisman DE
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 30557240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Network meta-analysis combining individual patient and aggregate data from a mixture of study designs with an application to pulmonary arterial hypertension.
    Thom HH; Capkun G; Cerulli A; Nixon RM; Howard LS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():34. PubMed ID: 25887646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Causal inference with observational data: the need for triangulation of evidence.
    Hammerton G; Munafò MR
    Psychol Med; 2021 Mar; 51(4):563-578. PubMed ID: 33682654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review.
    Wu R; Glen P; Ramsay T; Martel G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():70. PubMed ID: 24972453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Used in Observational Studies of Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
    Schoepfer AM; Schürmann C; Trelle S; Zwahlen M; Ma C; Chehade M; Dellon ES; Jairath V; Feagan BG; Bredenoord AJ; Biedermann L; Greuter T; Schreiner P; Straumann A; Safroneeva E
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2021; 182(12):1169-1193. PubMed ID: 34544078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Causal inference in perioperative medicine observational research: part 1, a graphical introduction.
    Krishnamoorthy V; Wong DJN; Wilson M; Raghunathan K; Ohnuma T; McLean D; Moonesinghe SR; Harris SK
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Sep; 125(3):393-397. PubMed ID: 32600803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.