330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29290291)
41. Derivation and validation of REASON: a risk score identifying candidates to screen for peripheral arterial disease using ankle brachial index.
Ramos R; Baena-Díez JM; Quesada M; Solanas P; Subirana I; Sala J; Alzamora M; Forès R; Masiá R; Elosua R; Grau M; Cordón F; Pera G; Rigo F; Martí R; Ponjoan A; Cerezo C; Brugada R; Marrugat J
Atherosclerosis; 2011 Feb; 214(2):474-9. PubMed ID: 21167488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Polytomous logistic regression analysis could be applied more often in diagnostic research.
Biesheuvel CJ; Vergouwe Y; Steyerberg EW; Grobbee DE; Moons KG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 18177785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. External validation of Vascular Study Group of New England risk predictive model of mortality after elective abdominal aorta aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative and comparison against established models.
Eslami MH; Rybin DV; Doros G; Siracuse JJ; Farber A
J Vasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 67(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 28807384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Predicting 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery: evaluation of six risk prediction models.
Karres J; Heesakkers NA; Ultee JM; Vrouenraets BC
Injury; 2015 Feb; 46(2):371-7. PubMed ID: 25464983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Finding the optimal multiple-test strategy using a method analogous to logistic regression: the diagnosis of hepatolenticular degeneration (Wilson's disease).
Richards RJ; Hammitt JK; Tsevat J
Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 8912298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A simple predictive model of prolonged intensive care unit stay after surgery for acquired heart valve disease.
Xu J; Ge Y; Hu S; Song Y; Sun H; Liu P
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 17484455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of the Mortality Probability Admission Model III, National Quality Forum, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV hospital mortality models: implications for national benchmarking*.
Kramer AA; Higgins TL; Zimmerman JE
Crit Care Med; 2014 Mar; 42(3):544-53. PubMed ID: 24158174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation in a multicenter dataset.
Güiza F; Depreitere B; Piper I; Van den Berghe G; Meyfroidt G
Crit Care Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):554-64. PubMed ID: 23263587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data.
Kuss O
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3789-801. PubMed ID: 12483767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Pre-operative and intraoperative determinants for prolonged ventilation following adult cardiac surgery.
Widyastuti Y; Stenseth R; Pleym H; Wahba A; Videm V
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 22091558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Prediction of Transfusions After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgical Procedures.
Likosky DS; Paugh TA; Harrington SD; Wu X; Rogers MA; Dickinson TA; DeLucia A; Benedetti BR; Prager RL; Zhang M; Paone G;
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 103(3):764-772. PubMed ID: 27726856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sample size calculation to externally validate scoring systems based on logistic regression models.
Palazón-Bru A; Folgado-de la Rosa DM; Cortés-Castell E; López-Cascales MT; Gil-Guillén VF
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176726. PubMed ID: 28459847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Development and validation of the critical care outcome prediction equation, version 4.
Duke GJ; Barker A; Rasekaba T; Hutchinson A; Santamaria JD
Crit Care Resusc; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 23944205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Ensor J; Archer L; Booth S; Mozumder SI; Rutherford MJ; van Smeden M; Lambert PC; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1280-1295. PubMed ID: 34915593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. External validation and calibration of IVFpredict: a national prospective cohort study of 130,960 in vitro fertilisation cycles.
Smith AD; Tilling K; Lawlor DA; Nelson SM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121357. PubMed ID: 25853703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Using administrative data for mortality risk adjustment in pediatric congenital cardiac surgery.
Kane JM; Scalcucci J; Hohmann SF; Johnson T; Behal R
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 14(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 23628836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model.
Bouwmeester W; Twisk JW; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Vergouwe Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23414436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A tutorial on calibration measurements and calibration models for clinical prediction models.
Huang Y; Li W; Macheret F; Gabriel RA; Ohno-Machado L
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Apr; 27(4):621-633. PubMed ID: 32106284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve.
Cook NR
Clin Chem; 2008 Jan; 54(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18024533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
