940 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29290604)
1. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.
Merolla G; Walch G; Ascione F; Paladini P; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Porcellini G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Apr; 27(4):701-710. PubMed ID: 29290604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study.
Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?
Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Bessière C; Chelli M; Gauci MO; Lemmex DB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2111-2122. PubMed ID: 32505414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral implant without a stem: clinical and radiologic outcomes in prospective 2- to 7-year follow-up study.
Levy O; Narvani A; Hous N; Abraham R; Relwani J; Pradhan R; Bruguera J; Sforza G; Atoun E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Aug; 25(8):1362-70. PubMed ID: 26923308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont-style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l'Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation.
Merolla G; Cuoghi F; Athwal GS; Parel I; Filippi MV; Cutti AG; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Paladini P; Catani F; Porcellini G
Int Orthop; 2021 Aug; 45(8):2061-2069. PubMed ID: 34212229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.
Freislederer F; Moroder P; Audigé L; Schneller T; Ameziane Y; Trefzer R; Imiolczyk JP; Scheibel M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Mar; 25(1):204. PubMed ID: 38454432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lee JH; Chun YM; Kim DS; Lee DH; Shin SJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2533-2542. PubMed ID: 33813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a patient-matched glenoid implant for severe glenoid bone deficiency.
Rangarajan R; Blout CK; Patel VV; Bastian SA; Lee BK; Itamura JM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S139-S148. PubMed ID: 32643608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study.
Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A
Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateralized Center of Rotation and Lower Neck-Shaft Angle Are Associated With Lower Rates of Scapular Notching and Heterotopic Ossification and Improved Pain for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at 1 Year.
Nelson R; Lowe JT; Lawler SM; Fitzgerald M; Mantell MT; Jawa A
Orthopedics; 2018 Jul; 41(4):230-236. PubMed ID: 29913030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference?
Freislederer F; Toft F; Audigé L; Marzel A; Endell D; Scheibel M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):341-351. PubMed ID: 34450279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and radiographic results of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study with 2 to 5 years of follow-up.
Wiater JM; Moravek JE; Budge MD; Koueiter DM; Marcantonio D; Wiater BP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Aug; 23(8):1208-14. PubMed ID: 24561176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A two-year comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty mini-humeral tray and augmented mini-glenoid baseplate implants vs. standard implants.
Krupp R; O'Grady C; Werner B; Wiater JM; Nyland J; Duquin T
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 May; 144(5):1925-1935. PubMed ID: 38523239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Lateralization Design on Scapular Notching: A Single-Surgeon Experience.
Schoch BS; Taba H; Aibinder W; King JJ; Wright TW
Orthopedics; 2020 Nov; 43(6):e585-e591. PubMed ID: 32818286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midterm results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a third-generation implant.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; Tahal DS; Mijc D; DeVito P; Motisi M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Apr; 28(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 30472054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a trabecular metal glenoid base plate: functional and radiological outcomes at two to five years.
Theivendran K; Varghese M; Large R; Bateman M; Morgan M; Tambe A; Espag M; Cresswell T; Clark DI
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jul; 98-B(7):969-75. PubMed ID: 27365476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Clinical Performance of Inlay versus Onlay Humerus Implants in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Lee HJ; Yoon CY; Kim YS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 36778983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
