These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29291672)
1. Making remembering more memorable. Leppanen ML; Lyle KB Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):960-973. PubMed ID: 29291672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-referential encoding does not benefit memory for prior remembering across changing contexts. Leppanen ML; Navangul AS; Feder GI; Jones DA; Kim K Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1176-1185. PubMed ID: 34486932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues. Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails. Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics. Hannon B; Craik FI Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning. DiMarco D; Marmurek H Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):119-131. PubMed ID: 35975624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time. McKinley GL; Ross BH; Benjamin AS Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):877-892. PubMed ID: 30725375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter? Goh WD; Tan H Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Remembering to remember: adult age differences in prospective memory. Mäntylä T J Gerontol; 1994 Nov; 49(6):P276-82. PubMed ID: 7963283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More than a feeling: Emotional cues impact the access and experience of autobiographical memories. Sheldon S; Donahue J Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):731-744. PubMed ID: 28244010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective Reminding and Free and Cued Selective Reminding in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease. Lemos R; Afonso A; Martins C; Waters JH; Blanco FS; Simões MR; Santana I Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 26375308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning from your mistakes: does it matter if you're out in left foot, I mean field? Cyr AA; Anderson ND Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 29659332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting. Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of cue content on retrieval from autobiographical memory. Uzer T; Brown NR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():84-91. PubMed ID: 27940026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Encoding and cuing sounds and senses. Nelson DL; Friedrich MA J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):717-31. PubMed ID: 7441188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007). Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]