623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29292190)
1. Confocal microscopic dual-laser dual-polarization FRET (2polFRET) at the acceptor side for correlating rotations at different distances on the cell surface.
Bene L; Gralle M; Damjanovich L
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2018 Apr; 1862(4):1050-1068. PubMed ID: 29292190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perrin and Förster unified: Dual-laser triple-polarization FRET (3polFRET) for interactions at the Förster-distance and beyond.
Ungvári T; Gogolák P; Bagdány M; Damjanovich L; Bene L
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Apr; 1863(4):703-16. PubMed ID: 26854711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Depolarized FRET (depolFRET) on the cell surface: FRET control by photoselection.
Bene L; Gogolák P; Ungvári T; Bagdány M; Nagy I; Damjanovich L
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Feb; 1863(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 26657258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-laser polarization FRET (polFRET) on the cell surface.
Bene L; Ungvári T; Fedor R; Damjanovich L
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 Dec; 1843(12):3047-64. PubMed ID: 25241341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-laser homo-FRET on the cell surface.
Bene L; Ungvári T; Fedor R; Nagy I; Damjanovich L
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1853(5):1096-112. PubMed ID: 25668611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flow cytometric measurement of fluorescence (Förster) resonance energy transfer from cyan fluorescent protein to yellow fluorescent protein using single-laser excitation at 458 nm.
He L; Bradrick TD; Karpova TS; Wu X; Fox MH; Fischer R; McNally JG; Knutson JR; Grammer AC; Lipsky PE
Cytometry A; 2003 May; 53(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 12701131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of receptor clustering by flow cytometric fluorescence anisotropy measurements.
Bene L; Fulwyler MJ; Damjanovich S
Cytometry; 2000 Aug; 40(4):292-306. PubMed ID: 10918280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and competing processes in donor-acceptor substituted DNA strands: a comparative study of ensemble and single-molecule data.
Dietrich A; Buschmann V; Müller C; Sauer M
J Biotechnol; 2002 Jan; 82(3):211-31. PubMed ID: 11999691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nanoparticle energy transfer on the cell surface.
Bene L; Szentesi G; Mátyus L; Gáspár R; Damjanovich S
J Mol Recognit; 2005; 18(3):236-53. PubMed ID: 15593286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-Laser Tetra-Polarization FRET (4polFRET) for Site-Selective Control of Homo-FRET in Hetero-FRET Systems on the Cell Surface: The Homo-FRET Gate.
Bene L; Bagdány M; Ungvári T; Damjanovich L
Anal Chem; 2018 Sep; 90(17):10159-10170. PubMed ID: 30080974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel calibration method for flow cytometric fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements between visible fluorescent proteins.
Nagy P; Bene L; Hyun WC; Vereb G; Braun M; Antz C; Paysan J; Damjanovich S; Park JW; Szöllősi J
Cytometry A; 2005 Oct; 67(2):86-96. PubMed ID: 16163690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A flow cytometric method to detect protein-protein interaction in living cells by directly visualizing donor fluorophore quenching during CFP-->YFP fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).
He L; Olson DP; Wu X; Karpova TS; McNally JG; Lipsky PE
Cytometry A; 2003 Oct; 55(2):71-85. PubMed ID: 14505312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Checkpoint for helicity conservation in fluorescence at the nanoscale: Energy and helicity transfer (hFRET) from a rotating donor dipole.
Bene L; Bagdány M; Damjanovich L
Biophys Chem; 2018 Aug; 239():38-53. PubMed ID: 29807308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long wavelength fluorophores and cell-by-cell correction for autofluorescence significantly improves the accuracy of flow cytometric energy transfer measurements on a dual-laser benchtop flow cytometer.
Sebestyén Z; Nagy P; Horváth G; Vámosi G; Debets R; Gratama JW; Alexander DR; Szöllosi J
Cytometry; 2002 Jul; 48(3):124-35. PubMed ID: 12116358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural changes of yellow Cameleon domains observed by quantitative FRET analysis and polarized fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
Borst JW; Laptenok SP; Westphal AH; Kühnemuth R; Hornen H; Visser NV; Kalinin S; Aker J; van Hoek A; Seidel CA; Visser AJ
Biophys J; 2008 Dec; 95(11):5399-411. PubMed ID: 18790855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) using anisotropy resolved multi-dimensional emission spectroscopy (ARMES).
Gordon F; Elcoroaristizabal S; Ryder AG
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2021 Feb; 1865(2):129770. PubMed ID: 33214128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum likelihood estimation of FRET efficiency and its implications for distortions in pixelwise calculation of FRET in microscopy.
Nagy P; Szabó A; Váradi T; Kovács T; Batta G; Szöllősi J
Cytometry A; 2014 Nov; 85(11):942-52. PubMed ID: 25123296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrasequence GFP in class I MHC molecules, a rigid probe for fluorescence anisotropy measurements of the membrane environment.
Rocheleau JV; Edidin M; Piston DW
Biophys J; 2003 Jun; 84(6):4078-86. PubMed ID: 12770911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity correlation-based calibration of FRET.
Bene L; Ungvári T; Fedor R; Sasi Szabó L; Damjanovich L
Biophys J; 2013 Nov; 105(9):2024-35. PubMed ID: 24209847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strength in numbers: effects of acceptor abundance on FRET efficiency.
Fábián ÁI; Rente T; Szöllosi J; Mátyus L; Jenei A
Chemphyschem; 2010 Dec; 11(17):3713-21. PubMed ID: 20936620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
