BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29292731)

  • 1. Cellulose Nanofibers Prepared via Pretreatment Based on Oxone
    Ruan CQ; Gustafsson S; Strømme M; Mihranyan A; Lindh J
    Molecules; 2017 Dec; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 29292731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation.
    Fukuzumi H; Saito T; Iwata T; Kumamoto Y; Isogai A
    Biomacromolecules; 2009 Jan; 10(1):162-5. PubMed ID: 19055320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enzymatic pretreatment for the improvement of dispersion and film properties of cellulose nanofibrils.
    Nie S; Zhang K; Lin X; Zhang C; Yan D; Liang H; Wang S
    Carbohydr Polym; 2018 Feb; 181():1136-1142. PubMed ID: 29253942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose through sequential periodate-chlorite oxidation.
    Liimatainen H; Visanko M; Sirviö JA; Hormi OE; Niinimaki J
    Biomacromolecules; 2012 May; 13(5):1592-7. PubMed ID: 22512713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose.
    Saito T; Kimura S; Nishiyama Y; Isogai A
    Biomacromolecules; 2007 Aug; 8(8):2485-91. PubMed ID: 17630692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanocomposite films based on xylan-rich hemicelluloses and cellulose nanofibers with enhanced mechanical properties.
    Peng XW; Ren JL; Zhong LX; Sun RC
    Biomacromolecules; 2011 Sep; 12(9):3321-9. PubMed ID: 21815695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preparation and characterization of starch-based composite films reinforced by cellulose nanofibers.
    Fazeli M; Keley M; Biazar E
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2018 Sep; 116():272-280. PubMed ID: 29729338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Starch-based nanocomposites with cellulose nanofibers obtained from chemical and mechanical treatments.
    Tibolla H; Czaikoski A; Pelissari FM; Menegalli FC; Cunha RL
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Oct; 161():132-146. PubMed ID: 32522543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facile strategy for improvement properties of whey protein isolate/walnut oil bio-packaging films: Using modified cellulose nanofibers.
    Samadani F; Behzad T; Enayati MS
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 Oct; 139():858-866. PubMed ID: 31398405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biodegradable cellulose I (II) nanofibrils/poly(vinyl alcohol) composite films with high mechanical properties, improved thermal stability and excellent transparency.
    Xing L; Hu C; Zhang W; Guan L; Gu J
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Dec; 164():1766-1775. PubMed ID: 32763405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viscoelastic evaluation of average length of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation.
    Ishii D; Saito T; Isogai A
    Biomacromolecules; 2011 Mar; 12(3):548-50. PubMed ID: 21261299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immobilization of antimicrobial peptides onto cellulose nanopaper.
    González I; Oliver-Ortega H; Tarrés Q; Delgado-Aguilar M; Mutjé P; Andreu D
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2017 Dec; 105(Pt 1):741-748. PubMed ID: 28735005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transparent bionanocomposite films based on chitosan and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers with enhanced mechanical and barrier properties.
    Soni B; Hassan EB; Schilling MW; Mahmoud B
    Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():779-789. PubMed ID: 27474625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical comparison of the properties of cellulose nanofibers produced from softwood and hardwood through enzymatic, chemical and mechanical processes.
    Sanchez-Salvador JL; Campano C; Balea A; Tarrés Q; Delgado-Aguilar M; Mutjé P; Blanco A; Negro C
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Apr; 205():220-230. PubMed ID: 35182566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Highly Carboxylated Cellulose Nanofibers via Succinic Anhydride Esterification of Wheat Fibers and Facile Mechanical Disintegration.
    Sehaqui H; Kulasinski K; Pfenninger N; Zimmermann T; Tingaut P
    Biomacromolecules; 2017 Jan; 18(1):242-248. PubMed ID: 27958715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of mechanical pretreatment to isolate cellulose nanocrystals by sulfuric acid hydrolysis.
    Pirich CL; Picheth GF; Machado JPE; Sakakibara CN; Martin AA; de Freitas RA; Sierakowski MR
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 Jun; 130():622-626. PubMed ID: 30831162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening of preservatives and evaluation of sterilized cellulose nanofibers for toxicity studies.
    Sai T; Maru J; Obara S; Endoh S; Kajihara H; Fujita K
    J Occup Health; 2020 Jan; 62(1):e12176. PubMed ID: 33159502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films prepared from non-wood resources.
    Puangsin B; Yang Q; Saito T; Isogai A
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2013 Aug; 59():208-13. PubMed ID: 23603078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the oxidation treatment on the production of cellulose nanofiber suspensions from Posidonia oceanica: The rheological aspect.
    Bettaieb F; Nechyporchuk O; Khiari R; Mhenni MF; Dufresne A; Belgacem MN
    Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Dec; 134():664-72. PubMed ID: 26428170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Holocellulose Nanofibers of High Molar Mass and Small Diameter for High-Strength Nanopaper.
    Galland S; Berthold F; Prakobna K; Berglund LA
    Biomacromolecules; 2015 Aug; 16(8):2427-35. PubMed ID: 26151837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.