192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293198)
1. Catheter Occlusion in Home Infusion: The Influence of Needleless Connector Design on Central Catheter Occlusion.
Williams A
J Infus Nurs; 2018; 41(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29293198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector.
Casey AL; Worthington T; Lambert PA; Quinn D; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 12919759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preventing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: development of an antiseptic barrier cap for needleless connectors.
Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):S174.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19084153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Home infusion pharmacy quality improvement for central venous access devices using anti-reflux needleless connectors to reduce occlusions, emergency room visits, and alteplase costs.
Buzas B; Smith J; Gilbert GE; Moureau N
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2022 Jun; 79(13):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 35323859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap.
Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16418982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related thrombotic occlusions.
Btaiche IF; Kovacevich DS; Khalidi N; Papke LF
J Infus Nurs; 2011; 34(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 21399454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection among patients with a needleless, mechanical valve-based intravenous connector in an Australian hematology-oncology unit.
Field K; McFarlane C; Cheng AC; Hughes AJ; Jacobs E; Styles K; Low J; Stow P; Campbell P; Athan E
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 May; 28(5):610-3. PubMed ID: 17464926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients.
Moureau N; Poole S; Murdock MA; Gray SM; Semba CP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Oct; 13(10):1009-16. PubMed ID: 12397122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical impact of needle-free connector design: A systematic review of literature.
Rosenthal VD
J Vasc Access; 2020 Nov; 21(6):847-853. PubMed ID: 32056487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of needleless connector device design on central venous catheter occlusion in children: a prospective, controlled trial.
Schilling S; Doellman D; Hutchinson N; Jacobs BR
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2006; 30(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16517952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective clinical trial to evaluate the microbial barrier of a needleless connector.
Casey AL; Burnell S; Whinn H; Worthington T; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2007 Mar; 65(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17241691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of reflux in commercially available needle-free IV connectors.
Hull GJ; Moureau NL; Sengupta S
J Vasc Access; 2018 Jan; 19(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29218697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial colonization of intravascular catheter connectors in hospitalized patients.
Hankins R; Majorant OD; Rupp ME; Cavalieri RJ; Fey PD; Lyden E; Cawcutt KA
Am J Infect Control; 2019 Dec; 47(12):1489-1492. PubMed ID: 31345614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive and Neutral Needleless Connectors: A Comparative Study of Central-line Associated Bloodstream Infection, Occlusion, and Bacterial Contamination of the Connector Lumen.
Schora D; Patel P; Barza R; Patel J; Wilson K; Espina-Gabriel P; Nunez V; Singh K
J Infus Nurs; 2023 May-Jun 01; 46(3):157-161. PubMed ID: 37104691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bloodstream infections associated with a needleless intravenous infusion system in patients receiving home infusion therapy.
Danzig LE; Short LJ; Collins K; Mahoney M; Sepe S; Bland L; Jarvis WR
JAMA; 1995 Jun; 273(23):1862-4. PubMed ID: 7776503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive-pressure needleless connectors did not increase rates of catheter hub colonization respecting the use of neutral-pressure needleless connectors in a prospective randomized trial.
Delgado M; Capdevila JA; Sauca G; Méndez J; Rodriguez A; Yébenes JC;
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed); 2020 Mar; 38(3):119-122. PubMed ID: 31668861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adequate disinfection of a split-septum needleless intravascular connector with a 5-second alcohol scrub.
Rupp ME; Yu S; Huerta T; Cavalieri RJ; Alter R; Fey PD; Van Schooneveld T; Anderson JR
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 33(7):661-5. PubMed ID: 22669226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of universal disinfectant cap implementation on central line-associated bloodstream infections.
Merrill KC; Sumner S; Linford L; Taylor C; Macintosh C
Am J Infect Control; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1274-7. PubMed ID: 25465256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective clinical study to investigate the microbial contamination ofa needleless connector.
Seymour VM; Dhallu TS; Moss HA; Tebbs SE; Elliot TS
J Hosp Infect; 2000 Jun; 45(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 10860694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Needle-free devices: keeping the system closed.
Kelly LJ; Jones T; Kirkham S
Br J Nurs; 2017 Jan; 26(2):S14-S19. PubMed ID: 28132546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
