256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293240)
1. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
Catlow R
Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review: Close inspection.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
Ploegh H
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Training peer reviewers.
Mackey DA
Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Q&A: The global view.
Dong-Yan J; Cheung F
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S37. PubMed ID: 25924200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
Insall R
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who would you share your funding with?
Bollen J
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7717):143. PubMed ID: 30089925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
Guglielmi G
Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review: Trial by Twitter.
Mandavilli A
Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7330):286-7. PubMed ID: 21248816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
Skórka P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
Waheed AA
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists.
Ball P
Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):900. PubMed ID: 16107806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Future impact: Predicting scientific success.
Acuna DE; Allesina S; Kording KP
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):201-2. PubMed ID: 22972278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How will you judge me if not by impact factor?
Tregoning J
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):345. PubMed ID: 29921857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Discourse among referees and editors would help.
Lahiri DK
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
Törnqvist TE
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Row erupts over university's use of research metrics in job-cut decisions.
Else H
Nature; 2021 Apr; 592(7852):19. PubMed ID: 33767466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
