256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293240)
21. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data.
Nicholson JK
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Peer review: Troubled from the start.
Csiszar A
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7599):306-8. PubMed ID: 27111616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
Lauer MS; Nakamura R
N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
van Loon AJ
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. EURYI: present procedure risks conflicts of interest.
Lente G
Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7056):192. PubMed ID: 16148909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students?
Sanchis-Gomar F
EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Making an impact.
Wu R
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.
Connerade JP
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
Colquhoun D
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dear DORA.
Jacobs H
EMBO Rep; 2013 Nov; 14(11):947. PubMed ID: 24169601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.
Gibson TA
Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Q&A Jane Harding: individual approach.
Harding J; Mallapaty S
Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S82-3. PubMed ID: 25054858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Rookie review.
Gewin V
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7368):275-7. PubMed ID: 21998887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Nature journals offer double-blind review.
Nature; 2015 Feb; 518(7539):274. PubMed ID: 25693523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
Cintas P
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
Korngreen A
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Forgotten plights.
Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7112):605-6. PubMed ID: 17035958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
