These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293240)

  • 41. Fund ideas, not pedigree, to find fresh insight.
    Sinkjær T
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):143. PubMed ID: 29517033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
    Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The secrets of success.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Scientific research and the human condition.
    Perez Velazquez JL
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6918):13. PubMed ID: 12511929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What's next for Registered Reports?
    Chambers C
    Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):187-189. PubMed ID: 31506624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Watch out for cheats in citation game.
    Biagioli M
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):201. PubMed ID: 27411599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Peer review could be improved by market forces.
    Jaffe K
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predicting scientific success.
    Mallapaty S
    Nature; 2018 Sep; 561(7723):S32-S33. PubMed ID: 30232443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
    DeCoursey TE
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Peer review: Revise rules on conflicts of interest.
    Žliobaitė I; Fortelius M
    Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7628):168. PubMed ID: 27830803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index.
    Stallings J; Vance E; Yang J; Vannier MW; Liang J; Pang L; Dai L; Ye I; Wang G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jun; 110(24):9680-5. PubMed ID: 23720314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Artificial intelligence is selecting grant reviewers in China.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2019 May; 569(7756):316-317. PubMed ID: 31089232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [The dark side of science].
    Calcagno V; Demoinet E
    Med Sci (Paris); 2013 Feb; 29(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 23452610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Who stands to lose from double-blind review?
    Garvalov BK
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Thoughtful peer review is worth the time it takes.
    Michalet X
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7046):1160. PubMed ID: 15988495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk.
    Fenning TM
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Research assessment exercises are necessary - but we need to learn to do them better.
    Nature; 2023 May; 617(7961):437. PubMed ID: 37193816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Submitting papers to several journals at once.
    Izunobi JU
    Nature; 2023 Nov; 623(7989):916. PubMed ID: 38017269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
    Bentley P
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.