438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293469)
1. Improving oncoplastic breast tumor bed localization for radiotherapy planning using image registration algorithms.
Wodzinski M; Skalski A; Ciepiela I; Kuszewski T; Kedzierawski P; Gajda J
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035024. PubMed ID: 29293469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography-planning computed tomography deformable image registration method for adaptive radiation therapy.
Lawson JD; Schreibmann E; Jani AB; Fox T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 8(4):96-113. PubMed ID: 18449149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy.
Broggi S; Scalco E; Belli ML; Logghe G; Verellen D; Moriconi S; Chiara A; Palmisano A; Mellone R; Fiorino C; Rizzo G
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 16(3):373-381. PubMed ID: 28168934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Object-constrained meshless deformable algorithm for high speed 3D nonrigid registration between CT and CBCT.
Chen T; Kim S; Goyal S; Jabbour S; Zhou J; Rajagopal G; Haffty B; Yue N
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 20175482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive evaluation of ten deformable image registration algorithms for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head & neck radiotherapy.
Li X; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wu S; Xiao Y; Gu X; Zhen X; Zhou L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175906. PubMed ID: 28414799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semi-Supervised Deep Learning-Based Image Registration Method with Volume Penalty for Real-Time Breast Tumor Bed Localization.
Wodzinski M; Ciepiela I; Kuszewski T; Kedzierawski P; Skalski A
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34198497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accelerated gradient-based free form deformable registration for online adaptive radiotherapy.
Yu G; Liang Y; Yang G; Shu H; Li B; Yin Y; Li D
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(7):2765-83. PubMed ID: 25767898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration.
Thörnqvist S; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen LN; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 20831491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of 12 DIR algorithms in low-contrast regions for mass and density conserving deformation.
Yeo UJ; Supple JR; Taylor ML; Smith R; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101701. PubMed ID: 24089891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.
Gazi PM; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Yang K; Boone JM
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6322-46. PubMed ID: 27494376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconstruction of 3D lung models from 2D planning data sets for Hodgkin's lymphoma patients using combined deformable image registration and navigator channels.
Ng A; Nguyen TN; Moseley JL; Hodgson DC; Sharpe MB; Brock KK
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1017-28. PubMed ID: 20384237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of the performance of different deformable image registration algorithms in helical, axial, and cone-beam CT images using a mobile phantom.
Ali I; Alsbou N; Jaskowiak J; Ahmad S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):62-73. PubMed ID: 29446235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MIND Demons: Symmetric Diffeomorphic Deformable Registration of MR and CT for Image-Guided Spine Surgery.
Reaungamornrat S; De Silva T; Uneri A; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Wolinsky JP; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2413-2424. PubMed ID: 27295656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity study of voxel-based PET image comparison to image registration algorithms.
Yip S; Chen AB; Aerts HJ; Berbeco R
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111714. PubMed ID: 25370628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance variations among clinically available deformable image registration tools in adaptive radiotherapy - how should we evaluate and interpret the result?
Nie K; Pouliot J; Smith E; Chuang C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27074457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Deformation Methods on the Accuracy of Deformable Image Registration From Kilovoltage CT to Tomotherapy Megavoltage CT.
Nobnop W; Chitapanarux I; Wanwilairat S; Tharavichitkul E; Lorvidhaya V; Sripan P
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033818821186. PubMed ID: 30803375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of deformable image registration techniques for alignment of longitudinal cholangiocarcinoma CT images.
Sen A; Anderson BM; Cazoulat G; McCulloch MM; Elganainy D; McDonald BA; He Y; Mohamed ASR; Elgohari BA; Zaid M; Koay EJ; Brock KK
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1670-1679. PubMed ID: 31958147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance evaluation of MIND demons deformable registration of MR and CT images in spinal interventions.
Reaungamornrat S; De Silva T; Uneri A; Goerres J; Jacobson M; Ketcha M; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Wolinsky JP; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8276-8297. PubMed ID: 27811396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
