203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293490)
41. Inferior alveolar nerve canal and branches detected with dental cone beam computed tomography in lower third molar region.
Yamada T; Ishihama K; Yasuda K; Hasumi-Nakayama Y; Ito K; Yamaoka M; Furusawa K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1278-82. PubMed ID: 21256640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Is 3T MR nerve-bone fusion imaging a viable alternative to MRI-CBCT to identify the relationship between the inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar.
Huang H; Yan Y; Jiang D; Zhao X; Cao D; She D
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Apr; 28(5):256. PubMed ID: 38630324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Is it possible to filter third molar cases with panoramic radiography in which roots surround the inferior alveolar canal? A comparison using cone-beam computed tomography.
Janovics K; Soós B; Tóth Á; Szalma J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 49(10):971-979. PubMed ID: 34090736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Does the Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Before Mandibular Third Molar Surgery Impact Treatment Planning?
Baqain ZH; AlHadidi A; AbuKaraky A; Khader Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 32277937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [A PhD completed. Pre-surgical assessment of the mandibular body and canal using CBCT imaging.].
Gerlach NL
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2018 Jun; 125(6):341-344. PubMed ID: 29928754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Proximity of mandibular third molar root(s) to surrounding cortical bone: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic findings.
Wihokrut S; Vorakulpipat C; Manosuthi P; Waikakul A
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 34374876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Accuracy of the vertical tube shift method in identifying the relationship between the third molars and the mandibular canal.
de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Oenning AC; Felizardo MG; Haiter-Neto F; de Freitas DQ
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):583-8. PubMed ID: 24994577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT compared with panoramic images in predicting retromolar canal during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Sisman Y; Ercan-Sekerci A; Payveren-Arikan M; Sahman H
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Jan; 20(1):e74-81. PubMed ID: 25475767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Characteristic findings on panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT to predict paresthesia after extraction of impacted third molar.
Harada N; Beloor Vasudeva S; Matsuda Y; Seki K; Kapila R; Ishikawa N; Okano T; Sano T
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2015; 56(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25765570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in predicting mandibular nerve exposure during third molar surgery.
Hasani A; Ahmadi Moshtaghin F; Roohi P; Rakhshan V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 46(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27810140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Analysis of C-shaped canals by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: root-type specificity by longitudinal distribution.
Sinanoglu A; Helvacioglu-Yigit D
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):917-21. PubMed ID: 24935535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography.
Wang D; He X; Wang Y; Li Z; Zhu Y; Sun C; Ye J; Jiang H; Cheng J
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 27316639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Identification of the inferior alveolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography vs. panoramic radiography: a retrospective comparative study.
Karameh R; Abu-Ta'a MF; Beshtawi KR
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):445. PubMed ID: 37403064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal.
Matzen LH; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):98870341. PubMed ID: 22933533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Elimination of permanent injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve following surgical intervention of the "high risk" third molar.
Umar G; Obisesan O; Bryant C; Rood JP
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 51(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 23010201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Detecting direct inferior alveolar nerve - Third molar contact and canal decorticalization by cone-beam computed tomography to predict postoperative sensory impairment.
Bozkurt P; Görürgöz C
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):259-263. PubMed ID: 31325623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Ma Z; Xu G; Yang C; Xie Q; Shen Y; Zhang S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
