These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293565)

  • 21. Joint kinematic calculation based on clinical direct kinematic versus inverse kinematic gait models.
    Kainz H; Modenese L; Lloyd DG; Maine S; Walsh HPJ; Carty CP
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1658-1669. PubMed ID: 27139005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Test-Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects.
    Molina-Rueda F; Fernández-González P; Cuesta-Gómez A; Koutsou A; Carratalá-Tejada M; Miangolarra-Page JC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33540795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can the reliability of three-dimensional running kinematics be improved using functional joint methodology?
    Pohl MB; Lloyd C; Ferber R
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 20732816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis.
    Besier TF; Sturnieks DL; Alderson JA; Lloyd DG
    J Biomech; 2003 Aug; 36(8):1159-68. PubMed ID: 12831742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of functional calibration and strap-down joint drift correction for computing 3D joint angles of knee, hip, and trunk in alpine skiing.
    Fasel B; Spörri J; Schütz P; Lorenzetti S; Aminian K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181446. PubMed ID: 28746383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Mechanical Sensor Designed for Dynamic Joint Angle Measurement.
    Ching CT; Liao SY; Cheng TY; Cheng CH; Sun TP; Yao YD; Hsiao CS; Chang KM
    J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():8465212. PubMed ID: 29065653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A method to calculate the centre of the ankle joint: a comparison with the Vicon Plug-in-Gait model.
    Nair SP; Gibbs S; Arnold G; Abboud R; Wang W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jul; 25(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 20388578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity of time series kinematical data as measured by a markerless motion capture system on a flatland for gait assessment.
    Tanaka R; Takimoto H; Yamasaki T; Higashi A
    J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 71():281-285. PubMed ID: 29475751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity of the OLGA and VCM models to erroneous marker placement: effects on 3D-gait kinematics.
    Groen BE; Geurts M; Nienhuis B; Duysens J
    Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 22245226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computation of the kinematics and the minimum peak joint moments of sit-to-stand movements.
    Yoshioka S; Nagano A; Himeno R; Fukashiro S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2007 Jul; 6():26. PubMed ID: 17608922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting lower limb joint kinematics using wearable motion sensors.
    Findlow A; Goulermas JY; Nester C; Howard D; Kenney LP
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jul; 28(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 18093834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gait evaluation of new powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis in able-bodied persons: a pilot study.
    Arazpour M; Ahmadi F; Bani MA; Hutchins SW; Bahramizadeh M; Ghomshe FT; Kashani RV
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 23660383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living.
    Hemmerich A; Brown H; Smith S; Marthandam SS; Wyss UP
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Apr; 24(4):770-81. PubMed ID: 16514664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new method for measuring AFO deformation, tibial and footwear movement in three dimensional gait analysis.
    Ridgewell E; Sangeux M; Bach T; Baker R
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):1074-6. PubMed ID: 23773907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of knee marker placement error on evaluation of gait kinematic parameters.
    Szczerbik E; Kalinowska M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 22098124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity of joint kinematics and kinetics to different pose estimation algorithms and joint constraints in the elderly.
    Moniz-Pereira V; Cabral S; Carnide F; Veloso AP
    J Appl Biomech; 2014 Jun; 30(3):446-60. PubMed ID: 24347565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis.
    Pfister A; West AM; Bronner S; Noah JA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2014 Jul; 38(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 24878252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of the 3D inverse dynamic method on the joint forces and moments during gait.
    Dumas R; Nicol E; Chèze L
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Oct; 129(5):786-90. PubMed ID: 17887905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical analysis of rollator walking.
    Alkjaer T; Larsen PK; Pedersen G; Nielsen LH; Simonsen EB
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Jan; 5():2. PubMed ID: 16398933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.