These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293637)

  • 21. Task-Specific, Age Related Effects in the Cross-Modal Identification and Localisation of Objects.
    Barrett MM; Newell FN
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(1-2):111-51. PubMed ID: 26152055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retrospective auditory cues can improve detection of near-threshold visual targets.
    Rimsky-Robert D; Störmer V; Sackur J; Sergent C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18966. PubMed ID: 31831788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional asymmetries in a visual orienting task are related to temperament.
    Garner KG; Dux PE; Wagner J; Cummins TD; Chambers CD; Bellgrove MA
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(8):1508-15. PubMed ID: 22650182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cross-modal links among vision, audition, and touch in complex environments.
    Ferris TK; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18354968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peripheral visual localization is degraded by globally incongruent auditory-spatial attention cues.
    Ahveninen J; Ingalls G; Yildirim F; Calabro FJ; Vaina LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 237(9):2137-2143. PubMed ID: 31201472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Top-down control of audiovisual search by bimodal search templates.
    Matusz PJ; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Oct; 50(10):996-1009. PubMed ID: 23834379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamics of within-, inter-, and cross-modal attentional modulation.
    Kida T; Inui K; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Feb; 105(2):674-86. PubMed ID: 21148089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disentangling attention from action in the emotional spatial cueing task.
    Mulckhuyse M; Crombez G
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(7):1223-41. PubMed ID: 24467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of attentional, auditory, and combined cues on walking during single and cognitive dual tasks in Parkinson disease.
    Lohnes CA; Earhart GM
    Gait Posture; 2011 Mar; 33(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 21273075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
    Wahn B; König P
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.
    Sosa Y; Clarke AM; McCourt ME
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(11):1207-15. PubMed ID: 21447353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the influence of sound parameters on crossmodal cuing in different regions of space.
    Lee J; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():96-103. PubMed ID: 29438877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):464-82. PubMed ID: 25341648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.