166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293736)
1. Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.
Mäntysaari EA; Evans RD; Strandén I
J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4728-4737. PubMed ID: 29293736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle.
Mäntysaari EA; Koivula M; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5314-5326. PubMed ID: 32331883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.
Nilforooshan MA; Lee M
J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1090-1100. PubMed ID: 30624671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?
Junqueira VS; Lourenco D; Masuda Y; Cardoso FF; Lopes PS; Silva FFE; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35289906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical implementation of genetic groups in single-step genomic evaluations with Woodbury matrix identity-based genomic relationship inverse.
Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Sep; 104(9):10049-10058. PubMed ID: 34099294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP.
Garcia A; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):66. PubMed ID: 36162979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
