These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29293736)

  • 1. Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.
    Mäntysaari EA; Evans RD; Strandén I
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4728-4737. PubMed ID: 29293736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
    Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
    Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle.
    Mäntysaari EA; Koivula M; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5314-5326. PubMed ID: 32331883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.
    Nilforooshan MA; Lee M
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1090-1100. PubMed ID: 30624671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing algorithms to approximate accuracies for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Ramos P; Garcia A; Retallik K; Bermann M; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Veroneze R; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 39011991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?
    Junqueira VS; Lourenco D; Masuda Y; Cardoso FF; Lopes PS; Silva FFE; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35289906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
    Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
    Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical implementation of genetic groups in single-step genomic evaluations with Woodbury matrix identity-based genomic relationship inverse.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Sep; 104(9):10049-10058. PubMed ID: 34099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.
    Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP.
    Garcia A; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):66. PubMed ID: 36162979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
    Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.