BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29294584)

  • 1. [Cost-effectiveness of multiple screening modalities on breast cancer in Chinese women from Shanghai].
    Wu F; Mo M; Qin XX; Fang H; Zhao GM; Liu GY; Chen YY; Cao ZG; Yan YJ; Lyu LL; Xu WH; Shao ZM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1665-1671. PubMed ID: 29294584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost effectiveness of mammography screening for Chinese women.
    Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
    Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(4):885-95. PubMed ID: 17607668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of two breast cancer screening modalities in Shanghai, China].
    Mo M; Zheng Y; Liu G; Fang H; Zhang X; Zhai L; Chen Y; Lyu L; Zhu J; Luo J; Zhang L; Cao Z; Xu W; Shao Z
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 37(12):944-51. PubMed ID: 26887627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
    Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
    Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
    J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of risk-based breast cancer screening programme, China.
    Sun L; Legood R; Sadique Z; Dos-Santos-Silva I; Yang L
    Bull World Health Organ; 2018 Aug; 96(8):568-577. PubMed ID: 30104797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria.
    Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Jahn B; Einzinger P; Zauner G; Urach C; Siebert U
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 28964436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
    Pataky R; Armstrong L; Chia S; Coldman AJ; Kim-Sing C; McGillivray B; Scott J; Wilson CM; Peacock S
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23837641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cost-effectiveness of an organized breast cancer screening program in Southern Brazil].
    Ribeiro RA; Caleffi M; Polanczyk CA
    Cad Saude Publica; 2013 Nov; 29 Suppl 1():S131-45. PubMed ID: 25402242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Risk Stratification to Optimize Mammography Screening in Chinese Women.
    Leung K; Wu JT; Wong IO; Shu XO; Zheng W; Wen W; Khoo US; Ngan R; Kwong A; Leung GM
    JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Aug; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 34377936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.
    Ohnuki K; Kuriyama S; Shoji N; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Ohuchi N
    Cancer Sci; 2006 Nov; 97(11):1242-7. PubMed ID: 16918992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
    Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Urban China: A Model-Based Analysis.
    Wang J; Greuter MJW; Zheng S; van Veldhuizen DWA; Vermeulen KM; Wang Y; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Sep; 11(9):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 34273933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling.
    Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost- Effectiveness of Mammography Screening Program in a Resource-Limited Post-Soviet Country of Kazakhstan.
    Salikhanov I; Crape B; Howie P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Oct; 20(10):3153-3160. PubMed ID: 31653167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer control strategies in Central America: the cases of Costa Rica and Mexico.
    Niëns LM; Zelle SG; Gutiérrez-Delgado C; Rivera Peña G; Hidalgo Balarezo BR; Rodriguez Steller E; Rutten FF
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95836. PubMed ID: 24769920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies.
    Mittmann N; Stout NK; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Yaffe MJ
    Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):16-25. PubMed ID: 26676235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.