185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29294952)
21. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Role of Defendant Gender and PTSD Diagnosis in a Battered Spouse Case.
Adair-Russell R; Reed K; Torres MF
J Interpers Violence; 2024 Jun; ():8862605241257594. PubMed ID: 38907659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
Devine K; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
Miller QC; Call AA; London K
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt.
Schvey NA; Puhl RM; Levandoski KA; Brownell KD
Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Sep; 37(9):1275-81. PubMed ID: 23295503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
Mossière A; Maeder EM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni F; Brown TR
Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial.
Lilley C; Willmott D; Mojtahedi D
Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1086026. PubMed ID: 36727087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
Butler E; Jacquin K
Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
Maeder EM; McManus LA
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Defendant mental illness and juror decision-making: A comparison of sample types.
Mossière A; Maeder EM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():58-66. PubMed ID: 26314888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
