271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29295058)
1. Consumer Health Informatics Aspects of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
Gray K; Stephen R; Terrill B; Wilson B; Middleton A; Tytherleigh R; Turbitt E; Gaff C; Savard J; Hickerton C; Newson A; Metcalfe S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():89-93. PubMed ID: 29295058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.
Shaer O; Nov O; Okerlund J; Balestra M; Stowell E; Ascher L; Bi J; Schlenker C; Ball M
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e146. PubMed ID: 26070951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.
Savard J; Hickerton C; Metcalfe SA; Gaff C; Middleton A; Newson AJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 31885332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Green RC
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 28068660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personal health information management: consumers' perspectives.
Civan A; Skeels MM; Stolyar A; Pratt W
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():156-60. PubMed ID: 17238322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
van der Wouden CH; Carere DA; Maitland-van der Zee AH; Ruffin MT; Roberts JS; Green RC;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 164(8):513-22. PubMed ID: 26928821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.
Metcalfe SA; Hickerton C; Savard J; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Gaff C; Gray K; Middleton A; Wilson B; Newson AJ
Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Aug; 26(8):1101-1112. PubMed ID: 29706641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.
Metcalfe SA; Hickerton C; Savard J; Stackpoole E; Tytherleigh R; Tutty E; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Gray K; Middleton A; Wilson B; Newson AJ; Gaff C
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):290-299. PubMed ID: 30439534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumers and Carers Versus Pharmacy Staff: Do Their Priorities for Australian Pharmacy Services Align?
McMillan SS; Kelly F; Sav A; Kendall E; King MA; Whitty JA; Wheeler AJ
Patient; 2015 Oct; 8(5):411-22. PubMed ID: 25512020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.
Marzulla T; Roberts JS; DeVries R; Koeller DR; Green RC; Uhlmann WR
J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):329-334. PubMed ID: 32648332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New Zealand consumers' health information needs: results of an interpretive descriptive study.
Honey ML; Roy DE; Bycroft JJ; Boyd MA
J Prim Health Care; 2014 Sep; 6(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 25194247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.
Chung MW; Ng JC
J Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 42(10):649-52. PubMed ID: 27250638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multidiscipline conceptual framework for consumer health informatics.
Logan RA; Tse T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1169-73. PubMed ID: 17911899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct-to-consumer mobile teledermoscopy for skin cancer screening: Preliminary results demonstrating willingness-to-pay in Australia.
Snoswell CL; Whitty JA; Caffery LJ; Loescher LJ; Gillespie N; Janda M
J Telemed Telecare; 2018 Dec; 24(10):683-689. PubMed ID: 30343653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Listening to the consumer voice: developing multilingual cancer information resources for people affected by liver cancer.
Robotin MC; Porwal M; Hopwood M; Nguyen D; Sze M; Treloar C; George J
Health Expect; 2017 Feb; 20(1):171-182. PubMed ID: 26929431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SimQ: real-time retrieval of similar consumer health questions.
Luo J; Zhang GQ; Wentz S; Cui L; Xu R
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e43. PubMed ID: 25689608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The expectations and realities of nutrigenomic testing in australia: A qualitative study.
Tutty E; Hickerton C; Terrill B; McClaren B; Tytherleigh R; Stackpoole E; Savard J; Newson A; Middleton A; Nisselle A; Cusack M; Adamski M; Gaff C; Metcalfe S
Health Expect; 2021 Apr; 24(2):670-686. PubMed ID: 33635607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.
Fleming J; Terrill B; Dziadek M; Kirk EP; Roscioli T; Barlow-Stewart K
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 31085343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer involvement in Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) projects - lessons from Australia.
Kirkpatrick CM; Roughead EE; Monteith GR; Tett SE
BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Dec; 5():75. PubMed ID: 16318638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Darst BF; Madlensky L; Schork NJ; Topol EJ; Bloss CS
Clin Genet; 2013 Oct; 84(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 23590221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
