BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29295278)

  • 1. Usability Evaluation of an EHR's Clinical Notes Interface from the Perspective of Attending and Resident Physicians: An Exploratory Study.
    Rizvi RF; Marquard JL; Seywerd MA; Adam TJ; Elison JT; Hultman GM; Harder KA; Melton GB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1128-1132. PubMed ID: 29295278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record System around Clinical Notes Usage-An Ethnographic Study.
    Rizvi RF; Marquard JL; Hultman GM; Adam TJ; Harder KA; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2017 Oct; 8(4):1095-1105. PubMed ID: 29241247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative observational study of inpatient clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval styles adopted by physicians.
    Rizvi RF; Harder KA; Hultman GM; Adam TJ; Kim M; Pakhomov SV; Melton GB
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Jun; 90():1-11. PubMed ID: 27103191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the usability of speech recognition to create clinical documentation using a commercial electronic health record.
    Hodgson T; Magrabi F; Coiera E
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 May; 113():38-42. PubMed ID: 29602431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resident Notes in an Electronic Health Record.
    Aylor M; Campbell EM; Winter C; Phillipi CA
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2017 Mar; 56(3):257-262. PubMed ID: 27400934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physicians' gender and their use of electronic health records: findings from a mixed-methods usability study.
    Khairat S; Coleman C; Ottmar P; Bice T; Koppel R; Carson SS
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 31504578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What are they trying to do?: An analysis of Action Identities in using electronic documentation in an EHR.
    Weir CR; Staes C; Slager S; Taft T; Chidambaram V; Kramer H; Bray BE; Moore SP
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1764-1772. PubMed ID: 29854247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mixed-methods evaluation framework for electronic health records usability studies.
    Khairat S; Coleman C; Newlin T; Rand V; Ottmar P; Bice T; Carson SS
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Jun; 94():103175. PubMed ID: 30981897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.
    Kaipio J; Kuusisto A; Hyppönen H; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104018. PubMed ID: 31835158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usability Testing of Two Ambulatory EHR Navigators.
    Hultman G; Marquard J; Arsoniadis E; Mink P; Rizvi R; Ramer T; Khairat S; Fickau K; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 27437057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting physicians' use of a dedicated overview interface in an electronic health record: The importance of standard information and standard documentation.
    Jensen LG; Bossen C
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():44-53. PubMed ID: 26806711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EHR Usage Problems: A Preliminary Study.
    Wawrzyniak C; Marcilly R; Baclet N; Hansske A; Pelayo S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():484-488. PubMed ID: 30741244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic health record innovations: Helping physicians - One less click at a time.
    Guo U; Chen L; Mehta PH
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):140-144. PubMed ID: 28671038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of nursing user interface screens using multiple methods.
    Hyun S; Johnson SB; Stetson PD; Bakken S
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Dec; 42(6):1004-12. PubMed ID: 19460464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the Impact of Clinical Training on EHR Use Optimization.
    Khairat S; Jayachander D; Coleman C; Newlin T; Rand V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Jul; 262():240-243. PubMed ID: 31349312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Electronic Health Record (EHR) Use during a Major EHR Transition: An Innovative Mixed Methods Approach.
    Molloy-Paolillo B; Mohr D; Levy DR; Cutrona SL; Anderson E; Rucci J; Helfrich C; Sayre G; Rinne ST
    J Gen Intern Med; 2023 Oct; 38(Suppl 4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 37798584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining differences in user performance between expert and novice primary care doctors when using an electronic health record (EHR).
    Clarke MA; Belden JL; Kim MS
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 25470668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resident Indentified Violations of Usability Heuristic Principles in Local Electronic Health Records.
    Berg GM; Shupsky T; Morales K
    Kans J Med; 2020; 13():84-89. PubMed ID: 32499860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.