These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29295280)

  • 1. Mapping the Electronic Health Record: A Method to Study Display Fragmentation.
    Senathirajah Y; Wang J; Borycki E; Kushniruk A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1138-1142. PubMed ID: 29295280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinician in the driver's seat: part 2 - intelligent uses of space in a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record.
    Senathirajah Y; Kaufman D; Bakken S
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():177-88. PubMed ID: 25445921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.
    Roman LC; Ancker JS; Johnson SB; Senathirajah Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Mar; 67():69-79. PubMed ID: 28088527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance.
    Ahmed A; Chandra S; Herasevich V; Gajic O; Pickering BW
    Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1626-34. PubMed ID: 21478739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. User-composable Electronic Health Record Improves Efficiency of Clinician Data Viewing for Patient Case Appraisal: A Mixed-Methods Study.
    Senathirajah Y; Kaufman D; Bakken S
    EGEMS (Wash DC); 2016; 4(1):1176. PubMed ID: 27195306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of a problem-oriented view on clinical data retrieval.
    Semanik MG; Kleinschmidt PC; Wright A; Willett DL; Dean SM; Saleh SN; Co Z; Sampene E; Buchanan JR
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Apr; 28(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 33566093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems.
    Sittig DF; Murphy DR; Smith MW; Russo E; Wright A; Singh H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4. PubMed ID: 25792704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing and Visualizing Display and Task Fragmentation in the Electronic Health Record: Mixed Methods Design.
    Senathirajah Y; Kaufman DR; Cato KD; Borycki EM; Fawcett JA; Kushniruk AW
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2020 Oct; 7(4):e18484. PubMed ID: 33084580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing and comparing the usability of Chinese EHRs used in two Peking University hospitals to EHRs used in the US: A method of RUA.
    Xu L; Wen D; Zhang X; Lei J
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 May; 89():32-42. PubMed ID: 26980357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinician in the Driver's Seat: part 1 - a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record platform.
    Senathirajah Y; Bakken S; Kaufman D
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():165-76. PubMed ID: 25240253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extracting insights from electronic health records: case studies, a visual analytics process model, and design recommendations.
    Wang TD; Wongsuphasawat K; Plaisant C; Shneiderman B
    J Med Syst; 2011 Oct; 35(5):1135-52. PubMed ID: 21541691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Improvement of the Electronic Health Record User Experience by Screen Design Principles.
    Fujita K; Onishi K; Takemura T; Kuroda T
    J Med Syst; 2019 Dec; 44(1):21. PubMed ID: 31823092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safer Design - Composable EHRs and Mechanisms for Safety.
    Senathirajah Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():86-92. PubMed ID: 26262532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A micro-analytic approach to understanding electronic health record navigation paths.
    Duncan BJ; Kaufman DR; Zheng L; Grando A; Furniss SK; Poterack KA; Miksch TA; Helmers RA; Doebbeling BN
    J Biomed Inform; 2020 Oct; 110():103566. PubMed ID: 32937215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing wrong patient selection errors: exploring the design space of user interface techniques.
    Sopan A; Plaisant C; Powsner S; Shneiderman B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():1056-65. PubMed ID: 25954415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous Video Recording of Electronic Health Record User Sessions to Support Usability and Safety.
    Wright A; Aaron S; Zuccotti G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():1811-1812. PubMed ID: 31438356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.
    Zahabi M; Kaber DB; Swangnetr M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):805-34. PubMed ID: 25850118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.