These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29295551)

  • 1. Animal-Based Measures to Assess the Welfare of Extensively Managed Ewes.
    Munoz C; Campbell A; Hemsworth P; Doyle R
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29295551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks.
    Munoz C; Campbell A; Barber S; Hemsworth P; Doyle R
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29316704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the welfare of extensively managed sheep.
    Munoz CA; Campbell AJD; Hemsworth PH; Doyle RE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218603. PubMed ID: 31216326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-observer agreement, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of animal-based indicators of young lamb welfare.
    Phythian CJ; Toft N; Cripps PJ; Michalopoulou E; Winter AC; Jones PH; Grove-White D; Duncan JS
    Animal; 2013 Jul; 7(7):1182-90. PubMed ID: 23561038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra- and Inter-Observer Reliability of Qualitative Behaviour Assessments of Housed Sheep in Norway.
    Diaz-Lundahl S; Hellestveit S; Stubsjøen SM; J Phythian C; Oppermann Moe R; Muri K
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 31426493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Meat-Type Sheep Welfare Using Animal-Based Measures.
    M'Hamdi N; Darej C; Attia K; Guesmi H; Znaïdi IEA; Bouraoui R; M'Hamdi H; Marzouki L; Ayadi M
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34359248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs.
    Pfeifer M; Eggemann L; Kransmann J; Schmitt AO; Hessel EF
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1712-1720. PubMed ID: 30630538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of indicators of sheep welfare assessed by a group observation method.
    Phythian CJ; Cripps PJ; Michalopoulou E; Jones PH; Grove-White D; Clarkson MJ; Winter AC; Stubbings LA; Duncan JS
    Vet J; 2012 Jul; 193(1):257-63. PubMed ID: 22266020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.
    Battini M; Vieira A; Barbieri S; Ajuda I; Stilwell G; Mattiello S
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Nov; 97(11):6625-48. PubMed ID: 25242423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Training method for animal-based measures in dairy cattle welfare assessments.
    Croyle SL; Nash CGR; Bauman C; LeBlanc SJ; Haley DB; Khosa DK; Kelton DF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9463-9471. PubMed ID: 30122408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-observer reliability testing of pig welfare outcome measures proposed for inclusion within farm assurance schemes.
    Mullan S; Edwards SA; Butterworth A; Whay HR; Main DCJ
    Vet J; 2011 Nov; 190(2):e100-e109. PubMed ID: 21377385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep.
    Richmond SE; Wemelsfelder F; de Heredia IB; Ruiz R; Canali E; Dwyer CM
    Front Vet Sci; 2017; 4():210. PubMed ID: 29322048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review of animal based indicators of sheep welfare on farm, at market and during transport, and qualitative appraisal of their validity and feasibility for use in UK abattoirs.
    Llonch P; King EM; Clarke KA; Downes JM; Green LE
    Vet J; 2015 Dec; 206(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 26598787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Associations between liveweight, body condition score and previous reproductive outcomes, and the risk of ewes bred at 18-months of age being dry at docking.
    Griffiths KJ; Ridler AL; Heuer C; Corner-Thomas RA; Kenyon PR
    N Z Vet J; 2018 Nov; 66(6):290-296. PubMed ID: 29985111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting ewe body condition score using adjusted liveweight for conceptus and fleece weight, height at withers, and previous body condition score record.
    Semakula J; Corner-Thomas RA; Morris ST; Blair HT; Kenyon PR
    Transl Anim Sci; 2021 Jul; 5(3):txab130. PubMed ID: 34790893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive attitudes, positive outcomes: The relationship between farmer attitudes, management behaviour and sheep welfare.
    Munoz CA; Coleman GJ; Hemsworth PH; Campbell AJD; Doyle RE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220455. PubMed ID: 31365546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iceberg Indicators for Animal Welfare in Rural Sheep Farms Using the Five Domains Model Approach.
    Hernandez RO; Sánchez JA; Romero MH
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33276493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal assessment of the impact of aging on wastage, productivity and welfare of ewes.
    Robertson SM; Friend MA
    Aust Vet J; 2023 Jun; 101(6):248-253. PubMed ID: 36965134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body condition score as a selection tool for targeted selective treatment-based nematode control strategies in Merino ewes.
    Cornelius MP; Jacobson C; Besier RB
    Vet Parasitol; 2014 Dec; 206(3-4):173-81. PubMed ID: 25466620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating observer agreement of scoring systems for foot integrity and footrot lesions in sheep.
    Foddai A; Green LE; Mason SA; Kaler J
    BMC Vet Res; 2012 May; 8():65. PubMed ID: 22630057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.