178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29295797)
1. Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit.
Ulu M; Soylu E; Kelebek S; Dikici S; Oflaz H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 46(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 29295797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
Oh JS; Kim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro study of a modified sagittal split osteotomy fixation technique of the mandible: a mechanical test.
Sonego CL; Scheffer MAR; Chagas Júnior OL; Vetromilla BM; Fernandes LP; Ozkomur A; Silva Júnior AN; Miguens Júnior SAQ; Hernandez PAG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 29655819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate.
Pereira Filho VA; Iamashita HY; Monnazzi MS; Gabrielli MF; Vaz LG; Passeri LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 22898312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep.
Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation methods in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review on in vitro biomechanical assessments.
Kuik K; De Ruiter MHT; De Lange J; Hoekema A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 30017569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Kuik K; Ho JPTF; de Ruiter MHT; Klop C; Kleverlaan CJ; de Lange J; Hoekema A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 59(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 33468331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques using a finite element method.
Albougha S; Darwich K; Darwich MA; Albogha MH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):823-9. PubMed ID: 25766461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of osteosynthesis with bicortical screws placed in a triangular shape in mandibular sagittal split 5 mm advancement osteotomy: biomechanical tests.
Hadi G; Karine BG; Yves C; Pierre L
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 48(8):624-8. PubMed ID: 20007004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of number and geometry of resorbable screws on biomechanical stability of in vitro model with sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Hwang JM; Baek SH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 22421826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates--a numerical study.
Albougha S; Albogha MH; Darwich MA; Darwich K
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 25784154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
