BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29297295)

  • 1. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
    Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate binning of metagenomic contigs via automated clustering sequences using information of genomic signatures and marker genes.
    Lin HH; Liao YC
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24175. PubMed ID: 27067514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MetaCon: unsupervised clustering of metagenomic contigs with probabilistic k-mers statistics and coverage.
    Qian J; Comin M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(Suppl 9):367. PubMed ID: 31757198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unsupervised Binning of Metagenomic Assembled Contigs Using Improved Fuzzy C-Means Method.
    Liu Y; Hou T; Kang B; Liu F
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017; 14(6):1459-1467. PubMed ID: 27295684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating metagenomics tools for genome binning with real metagenomic datasets and CAMI datasets.
    Yue Y; Huang H; Qi Z; Dou HM; Liu XY; Han TF; Chen Y; Song XJ; Zhang YH; Tu J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):334. PubMed ID: 32723290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate Binning of Metagenomic Contigs Using Composition, Coverage, and Assembly Graphs.
    Mallawaarachchi V; Lin Y
    J Comput Biol; 2022 Dec; 29(12):1357-1376. PubMed ID: 36367700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SolidBin: improving metagenome binning with semi-supervised normalized cut.
    Wang Z; Wang Z; Lu YY; Sun F; Zhu S
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(21):4229-4238. PubMed ID: 30977806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving contig binning of metagenomic data using [Formula: see text] oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity.
    Wang Y; Wang K; Lu YY; Sun F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 18(1):425. PubMed ID: 28931373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ICoVeR - an interactive visualization tool for verification and refinement of metagenomic bins.
    Broeksema B; Calusinska M; McGee F; Winter K; Bongiovanni F; Goux X; Wilmes P; Delfosse P; Ghoniem M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 28464793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets.
    Wu YW; Simmons BA; Singer SW
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):605-7. PubMed ID: 26515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BMC3C: binning metagenomic contigs using codon usage, sequence composition and read coverage.
    Yu G; Jiang Y; Wang J; Zhang H; Luo H
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 34(24):4172-4179. PubMed ID: 29947757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. METAMVGL: a multi-view graph-based metagenomic contig binning algorithm by integrating assembly and paired-end graphs.
    Zhang Z; Zhang L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 22(Suppl 10):378. PubMed ID: 34294039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binning Metagenomic Contigs Using Unsupervised Clustering and Reference Databases.
    Jiang Z; Li X; Guo L
    Interdiscip Sci; 2022 Dec; 14(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 35639335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CH-Bin: A convex hull based approach for binning metagenomic contigs.
    Chandrasiri S; Perera T; Dilhara A; Perera I; Mallawaarachchi V
    Comput Biol Chem; 2022 Oct; 100():107734. PubMed ID: 35964419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HiFine: integrating Hi-C-based and shotgun-based methods to refine binning of metagenomic contigs.
    Du Y; Sun F
    Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 38(11):2973-2979. PubMed ID: 35482530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovering complete and draft population genomes from metagenome datasets.
    Sangwan N; Xia F; Gilbert JA
    Microbiome; 2016 Mar; 4():8. PubMed ID: 26951112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BinSanity: unsupervised clustering of environmental microbial assemblies using coverage and affinity propagation.
    Graham ED; Heidelberg JF; Tully BJ
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3035. PubMed ID: 28289564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GraphBin: refined binning of metagenomic contigs using assembly graphs.
    Mallawaarachchi V; Wickramarachchi A; Lin Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3307-3313. PubMed ID: 32167528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes.
    Papudeshi B; Haggerty JM; Doane M; Morris MM; Walsh K; Beattie DT; Pande D; Zaeri P; Silva GGZ; Thompson F; Edwards RA; Dinsdale EA
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):915. PubMed ID: 29183281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective binning of metagenomic contigs using contrastive multi-view representation learning.
    Wang Z; You R; Han H; Liu W; Sun F; Zhu S
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):585. PubMed ID: 38233391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.