These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29297315)

  • 41. Comprehensive assessment of nine target prediction web services: which should we choose for target fishing?
    Ji KY; Liu C; Liu ZQ; Deng YF; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36681902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. TarFisDock: a web server for identifying drug targets with docking approach.
    Li H; Gao Z; Kang L; Zhang H; Yang K; Yu K; Luo X; Zhu W; Chen K; Shen J; Wang X; Jiang H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jul; 34(Web Server issue):W219-24. PubMed ID: 16844997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. 4. Multi-target QSAR modeling and comparative multi-distance study of the giant components of antiviral drug-drug complex networks.
    Prado-Prado FJ; Martinez de la Vega O; Uriarte E; Ubeira FM; Chou KC; González-Díaz H
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2009 Jan; 17(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 19112024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ligand prediction from protein sequence and small molecule information using support vector machines and fingerprint descriptors.
    Geppert H; Humrich J; Stumpfe D; Gärtner T; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):767-79. PubMed ID: 19309114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
    Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. FieldChopper, a new tool for automatic model generation and virtual screening based on molecular fields.
    Kalliokoski T; Ronkko T; Poso A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18489083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Toward a benchmarking data set able to evaluate ligand- and structure-based virtual screening using public HTS data.
    Lindh M; Svensson F; Schaal W; Zhang J; Sköld C; Brandt P; Karlén A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 25564966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Novel Non-Peptide Inhibitors against SmCL1 of Schistosoma mansoni: In Silico Elucidation, Implications and Evaluation via Knowledge Based Drug Discovery.
    Zafar A; Ahmad S; Rizvi A; Ahmad M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0123996. PubMed ID: 25933436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In silico target prediction for elucidating the mode of action of herbicides including prospective validation.
    Chiddarwar RK; Rohrer SG; Wolf A; Tresch S; Wollenhaupt S; Bender A
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Jan; 71():70-79. PubMed ID: 27846423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. Part 3: first multi-tasking QSAR model for input-coded prediction, structural back-projection, and complex networks clustering of antiprotozoal compounds.
    Prado-Prado FJ; González-Díaz H; de la Vega OM; Ubeira FM; Chou KC
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 16(11):5871-80. PubMed ID: 18485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1301-13. PubMed ID: 22411892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. GA(M)E-QSAR: a novel, fully automatic genetic-algorithm-(meta)-ensembles approach for binary classification in ligand-based drug design.
    Pérez-Castillo Y; Lazar C; Taminau J; Froeyen M; Cabrera-Pérez MÁ; Nowé A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Sep; 52(9):2366-86. PubMed ID: 22856471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening.
    Yang JM; Chen YF; Shen TW; Kristal BS; Hsu DF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1134-46. PubMed ID: 16045308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Exploring conformational search protocols for ligand-based virtual screening and 3-D QSAR modeling.
    Cappel D; Dixon SL; Sherman W; Duan J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Feb; 29(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 25408244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Computer Aided Drug Design for Multi-Target Drug Design: SAR /QSAR, Molecular Docking and Pharmacophore Methods.
    Abdolmaleki A; Ghasemi JB; Ghasemi F
    Curr Drug Targets; 2017; 18(5):556-575. PubMed ID: 26721410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In silico fragment-based drug discovery: setup and validation of a fragment-to-lead computational protocol using S4MPLE.
    Hoffer L; Renaud JP; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):836-51. PubMed ID: 23537132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predicting Molecular Targets for Small-Molecule Drugs with a Ligand-Based Interaction Fingerprint Approach.
    Cao R; Wang Y
    ChemMedChem; 2016 Jun; 11(12):1352-61. PubMed ID: 26222196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Al-Dabbagh MM; Salim N; Himmat M; Ahmed A; Saeed F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Apr; 31(4):365-378. PubMed ID: 28220440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for predicting biological properties, developed by combining structure- and ligand-based approaches: an application to the human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium channel inhibition.
    Coi A; Massarelli I; Saraceno M; Carli N; Testai L; Calderone V; Bianucci AM
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Oct; 74(4):416-33. PubMed ID: 19751420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.