These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29297705)
1. Use of the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH catheter for ablation of atrial fibrillation: the relationship between hospital procedure volume, re-admissions, and economic outcomes. Barnow A; Goldstein L; Kalsekar I; Liao R; Khanna R J Med Econ; 2018 May; 21(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 29297705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database. Costea A; Goldstein L; Maccioni S; Kalsekar I; Khanna R BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035499. PubMed ID: 32759243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic impact of atrial fibrillation ablation with radiofrequency contact force catheter versus cryoballoon catheter. Pollak SJ; Goldstein L; Daskiran M; Kalsekar I; Khanna R J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Mar; 8(4):251-264. PubMed ID: 30572711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of the ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis. Chen CF; Gao XF; Liu MJ; Jin CL; Xu YZ Clin Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 43(3):267-274. PubMed ID: 31743474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of real-world clinical and economic outcomes between the ThermoCool Chinitz L; Goldstein LJ; Barnow A; Maccioni S; Daskiran M; Kalsekar I; Khanna R Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2018; 10():587-599. PubMed ID: 30323636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters. Sciarra L; Golia P; Natalizia A; De Ruvo E; Dottori S; Scarà A; Borrelli A; De Luca L; Rebecchi M; Fagagnini A; Bandini A; Guarracini F; Galvani M; Calò L J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Apr; 39(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 24557861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal trends of in-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States: An update from Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2011-2014). Tripathi B; Arora S; Kumar V; Abdelrahman M; Lahewala S; Dave M; Shah M; Tan B; Savani S; Badheka A; Gopalan R; Shantha GPS; Viles-Gonzalez J; Deshmukh A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 29(5):715-724. PubMed ID: 29478273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiofrequency ablation using the ThermoCool SmartTouch Catheter guided by ablation index versus antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation treatment in China: a cost-consequence analysis. Zhang B; Han J; Zhou D; Jiang J; Zhong J; Lu Y; Zuo C; Lu X; Xuan J; Zu A; He Y; Sun X; Chen L; Zheng L J Comp Eff Res; 2024 Feb; 13(2):e230035. PubMed ID: 38205729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and Effectiveness of a Catheter With Contact Force and 6-Hole Irrigation for Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Routine Clinical Practice. Dhruva SS; Zhang S; Chen J; Noseworthy PA; Doshi AA; Agboola KM; Herrin J; Jiang G; Yu Y; Cafri G; Collison Farr K; Ervin KR; Ross JS; Coplan PM; Drozda JP JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Aug; 5(8):e2227134. PubMed ID: 35976649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-world safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with contact force or cryoballoon ablation. Natale A; Mohanty S; Goldstein L; Gomez T; Hunter TD J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Apr; 60(3):445-452. PubMed ID: 32390061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Macle L; Frame D; Gache LM; Monir G; Pollak SJ; Boo LM BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e023775. PubMed ID: 31189669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation versus cryoablation for atrial fibrillation in hospitals using both technologies. Hunter TD; Palli SR; Rizzo JA J Med Econ; 2016 Oct; 19(10):959-64. PubMed ID: 27187895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Voltage Signal Measurement During Radiofrequency Delivery Through the SMARTTOUCH Catheter. Safavi-Naeini P; Zafar-Awan D; Zhu H; Zablah G; Ganapathy AV; Rasekh A; Saeed M; Razavi JE; Razavi M J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 27762474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters. Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Lee G; Hunter RJ; Lovell MJ; Finlay M; Ullah W; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ Europace; 2016 Feb; 18(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 26318548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]