386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29298261)
21. Measurements of three-dimensional glenoid erosion when planning the prosthetic replacement of osteoarthritic shoulders.
Terrier A; Ston J; Larrea X; Farron A
Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 24692620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hsu CP; Wu CT; Chen CY; Lin SC; Hsu KY
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jul; 143(7):4065-4075. PubMed ID: 36445496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty.
Scalise JJ; Codsi MJ; Bryan J; Brems JJ; Iannotti JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Nov; 90(11):2438-45. PubMed ID: 18978413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications.
Lowe JT; Testa EJ; Li X; Miller S; DeAngelis JP; Jawa A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Apr; 26(4):669-673. PubMed ID: 27765501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation between glenoid inclination and critical shoulder angle: a radiographic and computed tomography study.
Daggett M; Werner B; Collin P; Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Dec; 24(12):1948-53. PubMed ID: 26350880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interdepartmental imaging protocol for clinically based three-dimensional computed tomography can provide accurate measurement of glenoid version.
Zale CL; Pace GI; Lewis GS; Chan J; Kim HM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1297-1305. PubMed ID: 29331571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hoenecke HR; Hermida JC; Flores-Hernandez C; D'Lima DD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Mar; 19(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 19959378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated three-dimensional measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation.
Shukla DR; McLaughlin RJ; Lee J; Nguyen NTV; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Shoulder Elbow; 2020 Feb; 12(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32010231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Testing of a novel pin array guide for accurate three-dimensional glenoid component positioning.
Lewis GS; Stevens NM; Armstrong AD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Dec; 24(12):1939-47. PubMed ID: 26256017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Description and reproducibility assessment of a new computerised tomography scan index to measure the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior glenoid surface.
Moraiti C; Klouche S; Werthel JD; Bauer T; Hardy P
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):1017-1022. PubMed ID: 27699459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis and 3D correction of glenoid dysplasia with metal hemi-wedge base plate augment: short-term radiographic outcomes.
Guehring T; Navas L; Westrich J; Zimmerer A; Schmidt S; Barrientos M; Ulmar B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Aug; 143(8):4763-4772. PubMed ID: 36705760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle according to the size of the baseplate.
Werthel JD; Villard A; Kazum E; Deransart P; Ramirez O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Feb; 32(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 35998779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability.
van de Bunt F; Pearl ML; Lee EK; Peng L; Didomenico P
Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 26201674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.
Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative analysis of 2 glenoid version measurement methods in variable axial slices on 3-dimensionally reconstructed computed tomography scans.
Cunningham G; Freebody J; Smith MM; Taha ME; Young AA; Cass B; Giuffre B
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1809-1815. PubMed ID: 29778592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study of the variability of scapular inclination and the glenoid version - considerations for preoperative planning: clinical-radiological study.
Fulin P; Kysilko M; Pokorny D; Padr R; Kasprikova N; Landor I; Sosna A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.
Ozel O; Hudek R; Abdrabou MS; Werner BS; Gohlke F
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Oct; 21(1):668. PubMed ID: 33036604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder.
Maurer A; Fucentese SF; Pfirrmann CW; Wirth SH; Djahangiri A; Jost B; Gerber C
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1096-103. PubMed ID: 22036540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 3D CT assessment of the relationship between humeral head alignment and glenoid retroversion in glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Sabesan VJ; Callanan M; Youderian A; Iannotti JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(8):e64. PubMed ID: 24740672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
