These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29298296)

  • 1. A multi-criteria decision analysis of management alternatives for anaerobically digested kraft pulp mill sludge.
    Eikelboom M; Lopes ADCP; Silva CM; Rodrigues FÁ; Zanuncio AJV; Zanuncio JC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188732. PubMed ID: 29298296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill wastewater and sludge.
    Meyer T; Edwards EA
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 65():321-49. PubMed ID: 25150519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Batchwise mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of secondary sludge from pulp and paper industry and municipal sewage sludge.
    Hagelqvist A
    Waste Manag; 2013 Apr; 33(4):820-4. PubMed ID: 23294534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment of pulp mill secondary sludge for high-rate anaerobic conversion to biogas.
    Wood N; Tran H; Master E
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(23):5729-35. PubMed ID: 19615891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of pretreatment techniques on anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill sludge: A review.
    Veluchamy C; Kalamdhad AS
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Dec; 245(Pt A):1206-1219. PubMed ID: 28893499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life cycle assessment of alternative pulp mill sludge treatment methods in Finland.
    Salcedo-Puerto O; Breton M; Sermyagina E; Gonçalves L; Cardoso M; Havukainen J; Vakkilainen E; Mendoza-Martinez C
    Waste Manag; 2024 Sep; 186():236-248. PubMed ID: 38941734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-rate anaerobic co-digestion of kraft mill fibre sludge and activated sludge by CSTRs with sludge recirculation.
    Ekstrand EM; Karlsson M; Truong XB; Björn A; Karlsson A; Svensson BH; Ejlertsson J
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():166-72. PubMed ID: 27453288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration, gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece.
    Samolada MC; Zabaniotou AA
    Waste Manag; 2014 Feb; 34(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 24290971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental & economic life cycle assessment of current & future sewage sludge to energy technologies.
    Mills N; Pearce P; Farrow J; Thorpe RB; Kirkby NF
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jan; 34(1):185-95. PubMed ID: 24060290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life cycle environmental impacts of sewage sludge treatment methods for resource recovery considering ecotoxicity of heavy metals and pharmaceutical and personal care products.
    Tarpani RRZ; Alfonsín C; Hospido A; Azapagic A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():109643. PubMed ID: 32090790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vermiconversion of wastewater sludge from textile mill mixed with anaerobically digested biogas plant slurry employing Eisenia foetida.
    Garg VK; Kaushik P; Dilbaghi N
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 Nov; 65(3):412-9. PubMed ID: 16406585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-treatment options for anaerobically digested sludge: Current status and future prospect.
    Wang Z; Liu T; Duan H; Song Y; Lu X; Hu S; Yuan Z; Batstone D; Zheng M
    Water Res; 2021 Oct; 205():117665. PubMed ID: 34547700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pretreatment technologies for advancing anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper biotreatment residues.
    Elliott A; Mahmood T
    Water Res; 2007 Nov; 41(19):4273-86. PubMed ID: 17628630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste.
    Morero B; Vicentin R; Campanella EA
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():195-205. PubMed ID: 27955887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarking environmental and economic indicators of sludge management alternatives aimed at enhanced energy efficiency and nutrient recovery.
    Arias A; Feijoo G; Moreira MT
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 279():111594. PubMed ID: 33160744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving products of anaerobic sludge digestion by microaeration.
    Jenicek P; Celis CA; Krayzelova L; Anferova N; Pokorna D
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 24569280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental comparison of alternative treatments for sewage sludge: An Italian case study.
    Lombardi L; Nocita C; Bettazzi E; Fibbi D; Carnevale E
    Waste Manag; 2017 Nov; 69():365-376. PubMed ID: 28865907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustainable design of large wastewater treatment plants considering multi-criteria decision analysis and stakeholders' involvement.
    Gherghel A; Teodosiu C; Notarnicola M; De Gisi S
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110158. PubMed ID: 32001432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Balancing hygienization and anaerobic digestion of raw sewage sludge.
    Astals S; Venegas C; Peces M; Jofre J; Lucena F; Mata-Alvarez J
    Water Res; 2012 Dec; 46(19):6218-27. PubMed ID: 23063441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant.
    Pasqualino JC; Meneses M; Abella M; Castells F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May; 43(9):3300-7. PubMed ID: 19534150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.