These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29298563)
1. Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts. Zenker F; Dahlman C; Bååth R; Sarwar F Psychol Rep; 2018 Jun; 121(3):511-526. PubMed ID: 29298563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. Croskerry P; Singhal G; Mamede S BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Oct; 22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii58-ii64. PubMed ID: 23882089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laws of cognition and the cognition of law. Kahan DM Cognition; 2015 Feb; 135():56-60. PubMed ID: 25511199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive Debiasing Strategies: A Faculty Development Workshop for Clinical Teachers in Emergency Medicine. Daniel M; Carney M; Khandelwal S; Merritt C; Cole M; Malone M; Hemphill RR; Peterson W; Burkhardt J; Hopson L; Santen SA MedEdPORTAL; 2017 Oct; 13():10646. PubMed ID: 30800847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is it time for studying real-life debiasing? Evaluation of the effectiveness of an analogical intervention technique. Aczel B; Bago B; Szollosi A; Foldes A; Lukacs B Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1120. PubMed ID: 26300816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Debiasing thinking among non-WEIRD reasoners. Boissin E; Josserand M; De Neys W; Caparos S Cognition; 2024 Feb; 243():105681. PubMed ID: 38043179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Debiasing Training Improves Decision Making in the Field. Sellier AL; Scopelliti I; Morewedge CK Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1371-1379. PubMed ID: 31347444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reclaiming magical incantation in graduate medical education. Katz JD; George DT Clin Rheumatol; 2020 Mar; 39(3):703-707. PubMed ID: 31724095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reasoning, biases and dual processes: The lasting impact of Wason (1960). Evans JS Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Oct; 69(10):2076-92. PubMed ID: 25158629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students. Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Debiasing Health-Related Judgments and Decision Making: A Systematic Review. Ludolph R; Schulz PJ Med Decis Making; 2018 Jan; 38(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 28649904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cognitive bias and severity of harm following surgery: Plan for workflow debiasing strategy. Antonacci AC; Dechario SP; Rindskopf D; Husk G; Jarrett M Am J Surg; 2021 Dec; 222(6):1172-1177. PubMed ID: 34511201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Credibility of the emotional witness: a study of ratings by court judges. Wessel E; Drevland GC; Eilertsen DE; Magnussen S Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 16786408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Binary Bias: A Systematic Distortion in the Integration of Information. Fisher M; Keil FC Psychol Sci; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 30285536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. Croskerry P; Singhal G; Mamede S BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Oct; 22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii65-ii72. PubMed ID: 23996094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]