These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29298572)

  • 1. Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.
    Birkás B; Láng A; Meskó N
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Feb; 121(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 29298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.
    Gerlach TM; Arslan RC; Schultze T; Reinhard SK; Penke L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):313-330. PubMed ID: 28921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dark Triad Traits and Mate Retention Behaviors in Romantic Couples: The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.
    Kardum I; Hudek-Knezevic J; Mehic N
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(4):1474704919887703. PubMed ID: 31833789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mate value discrepancies, the Dark Triad and relationship satisfaction: A Euclidean distances approach.
    Goetz CD; Meyer KB
    Evol Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 4(2):134-140. PubMed ID: 29916459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical attractiveness, attitudes toward career, and mate preferences among young Chinese women.
    Zhang H; Teng F; Chan DK; Zhang D
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 12(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 24525338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human nonindependent mate choice: is model female attractiveness everything?
    Vakirtzis A; Roberts SC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 May; 10(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 22947636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The synergistic effect of prosociality and physical attractiveness on mate desirability.
    Ehlebracht D; Stavrova O; Fetchenhauer D; Farrelly D
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 109(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 29250771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial and self-report questionnaire measures capture different aspects of romantic partner preferences.
    South Palomares JK; Young AW
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):549-575. PubMed ID: 30270430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of the physical attractiveness of the self, current romantic partners, and former partners.
    Swami V; Allum L
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 21995611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: further investigations using the Mate Preferences Towards Altruistic Traits Scale.
    Farrelly D
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 23951948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Exploitive Mating Strategy of the Dark Triad Traits: Tests of Rape-Enabling Attitudes.
    Jonason PK; Girgis M; Milne-Home J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Apr; 46(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 28120149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.
    Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis.
    Eastwick PW; Luchies LB; Finkel EJ; Hunt LL
    Psychol Bull; 2014 May; 140(3):623-665. PubMed ID: 23586697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ; Eagly AH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):1012-32. PubMed ID: 21707198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of physical attractiveness in romantic partners: modeling biological and social variables.
    Jonason PK
    J Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 149(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 19425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.