These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29298603)

  • 1. Quantitative imaging biomarkers: Effect of sample size and bias on confidence interval coverage.
    Obuchowski NA; Bullen J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Oct; 27(10):3139-3150. PubMed ID: 29298603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Importance of incorporating quantitative imaging biomarker technical performance characteristics when estimating treatment effects.
    Obuchowski NA; Remer EM; Sakaie K; Schneider E; Fox RJ; Nakamura K; Avila R; Guimaraes A
    Clin Trials; 2021 Apr; 18(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 33426918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting Change in Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):372-379. PubMed ID: 29191687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the Precision of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers without Test-Retest Studies.
    Obuchowski NA; Buckler AJ
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):543-549. PubMed ID: 34272163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian framework for performance assessment and comparison of imaging biomarker quantification methods.
    Smith BJ; Beichel RR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Apr; 28(4):1003-1018. PubMed ID: 29271301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel confidence interval for a single proportion in the presence of clustered binary outcome data.
    Short MI; Cabral HJ; Weinberg JM; LaValley MP; Massaro JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jan; 29(1):111-121. PubMed ID: 30672389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical Considerations for Planning Clinical Trials with Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers.
    Obuchowski NA; Mozley PD; Matthews D; Buckler A; Bullen J; Jackson E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Jan; 111(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 30597055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference-free error estimation for multiple measurement methods.
    Madan H; Pernuš F; Špiclin Ž
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2196-2209. PubMed ID: 29384043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment.
    Raunig DL; McShane LM; Pennello G; Gatsonis C; Carson PL; Voyvodic JT; Wahl RL; Kurland BF; Schwarz AJ; Gönen M; Zahlmann G; Kondratovich MV; O'Donnell K; Petrick N; Cole PE; Garra B; Sullivan DC;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):27-67. PubMed ID: 24919831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals for distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions in multiple regression.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Jun; 20(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 25844629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear regression and the normality assumption.
    Schmidt AF; Finan C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():146-151. PubMed ID: 29258908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: a simulation study.
    Chu R; Thabane L; Ma J; Holbrook A; Pullenayegum E; Devereaux PJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():21. PubMed ID: 21338524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical issues in the comparison of quantitative imaging biomarker algorithms using pulmonary nodule volume as an example.
    Obuchowski NA; Barnhart HX; Buckler AJ; Pennello G; Wang XF; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Kim HJ; Reeves AP;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):107-40. PubMed ID: 24919828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.