These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29298708)

  • 1. Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment.
    Schweitzer W; Thali MJ; Egger D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
    Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of transradial body-powered prostheses using a robotic simulator.
    Ayub R; Villarreal D; Gregg RD; Gao F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 27469105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review.
    Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ;
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control.
    Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning from demonstration: Teaching a myoelectric prosthesis with an intact limb via reinforcement learning.
    Vasan G; Pilarski PM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1457-1464. PubMed ID: 28814025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities.
    Carey SL; Dubey RV; Bauer GS; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 19367522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of novel 3D-printed robotic prosthetic for transradial amputees.
    Gretsch KF; Lather HD; Peddada KV; Deeken CR; Wall LB; Goldfarb CA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):400-3. PubMed ID: 25934422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent advances in research in prosthetics for children.
    Shaperman J; Sumida CT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 May; (148):26-33. PubMed ID: 7379404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
    Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finch: Prosthetic Arm With Three Opposing Fingers Controlled by a Muscle Bulge.
    Yoshikawa M; Ogawa K; Yamanaka S; Kawashima N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():377-386. PubMed ID: 36399588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
    Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
    Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting a Grip on the Impact of Incidental Feedback From Body-Powered and Myoelectric Prostheses.
    Gonzalez MA; Lee C; Kang J; Gillespie RB; Gates DH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1905-1912. PubMed ID: 34516377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fabrication and application of an adjustable myoelectric transhumeral prosthetic socket.
    Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Stobbe M; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):564-567. PubMed ID: 30922181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of real-time machine learning to myoelectric prosthesis control: A case series in adaptive switching.
    Edwards AL; Dawson MR; Hebert JS; Sherstan C; Sutton RS; Chan KM; Pilarski PM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26423106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SoftHand Pro platform: a flexible prosthesis with a user-centered approach.
    Capsi-Morales P; Piazza C; Grioli G; Bicchi A; Catalano MG
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 36755249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of a low-cost three-dimensional printed shoulder, arm, and hand prostheses for children.
    Zuniga JM; Carson AM; Peck JM; Kalina T; Srivastava RM; Peck K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):205-209. PubMed ID: 27117013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Empirical Evaluation of Force Feedback in Body-Powered Prostheses.
    Brown JD; Kunz TS; Gardner D; Shelley MK; Davis AJ; Gillespie RB
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Mar; 25(3):215-226. PubMed ID: 27101614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.