These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29299191)

  • 1. Comparison of two different debonding techniques in orthodontic treatment.
    Piccoli L; Migliau G; Besharat LK; Di Carlo S; Pompa G; Di Giorgio R
    Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2017; 8(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 29299191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Bond Strength of Brackets with Foil Mesh and Laser Structure Base using Light Cure Composite Resin: An in vitro Study.
    Rajesh RN; Girish KS; Sanjay N; Scindhia RD; Kumar SG; Rajesh S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 16(12):963-70. PubMed ID: 27018031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel gloss changes induced by orthodontic bonding.
    Sifakakis I; Zinelis S; Eliades G; Koletsi D; Eliades T
    J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 45(4):269-274. PubMed ID: 30392447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metallic bracket to enamel bonding with a photopolymerizable resin-reinforced glass ionomer.
    Flores AR; Sáez E G; Barceló F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Nov; 116(5):514-7. PubMed ID: 10547509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Yamada R; Hayakawa T; Kasai K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12518948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional quantification of adhesive remnants on teeth after debonding.
    Lee YK; Lim YK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 18929274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safe Debonding of Fixed Appliances: A Comparison of Traditional Techniques and LODI Devices on Different Bracket Types in Terms of Enamel Cracks, Site of Bond Failure, and Bracket Reusability.
    Gibas-Stanek M; Pihut M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of composite resin types and debonding pliers on the amount of adhesive remnants and enamel damages: a stereomicroscopic evaluation.
    Salehi P; Pakshir H; Naseri N; Baherimoghaddam T
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2013; 7(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 24578817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.
    Foek DL; Ozcan M; Krebs E; Sandham A
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 19841765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives.
    Bishara SE; VonWald L; Olsen ME; Laffoon JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):616-20. PubMed ID: 10587594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin.
    Norevall LI; Marcusson A; Persson M
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Aug; 18(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 8921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.