These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29300850)

  • 1. Soft tissue changes: a comparison between changes caused by the construction bite and by successful treatment with a modified Twin-block appliance.
    Salloum E; Millett DT; Kelly N; McIntyre GT; Cronin MS
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):512-518. PubMed ID: 29300850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the twin block appliance in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients. A systematic review.
    Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):876-81. PubMed ID: 17029526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An extended period of functional appliance therapy: a controlled clinical trial comparing the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances.
    Lee RT; Barnes E; DiBiase A; Govender R; Qureshi U
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):512-21. PubMed ID: 23291502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy.
    Quintão C; Helena I; Brunharo VP; Menezes RC; Almeida MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16113035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics.
    Singh GD
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Feb; 5(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 12071373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21357655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The twin block appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion.
    Gill D; Sharma A; Naini F; Jones S
    Dent Update; 2005 Apr; 32(3):158-60, 163-4, 167-8. PubMed ID: 15881511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term hard and soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement surgery in Class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study.
    Storms AS; Miclotte A; Grosjean L; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Alqerban A; Fieuws S; Sun Y; Politis C; Verdonck A; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Oct; 39(5):567-576. PubMed ID: 28204270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects.
    Ghodke S; Utreja AK; Singh SP; Jena AK
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):68. PubMed ID: 25534004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF; Oliveira AG
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Kochel J; Richter U; Richter F; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Apr; 73(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 22391787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft- and hard-tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with Activator versus Trainer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Idris G; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 41(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 29617755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.