These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29301477)

  • 1. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study.
    Wittmann J; Kocjan G; Sgouros SN; Deheragoda M; Pereira SP
    Cytopathology; 2006 Feb; 17(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 16417562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 68.