215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29301966)
1. Pairwise comparisons across species are problematic when analyzing functional genomic data.
Dunn CW; Zapata F; Munro C; Siebert S; Hejnol A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(3):E409-E417. PubMed ID: 29301966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Special Care Is Needed in Applying Phylogenetic Comparative Methods to Gene Trees with Speciation and Duplication Nodes.
Begum T; Robinson-Rechavi M
Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Apr; 38(4):1614-1626. PubMed ID: 33169790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons.
Remm M; Storm CE; Sonnhammer EL
J Mol Biol; 2001 Dec; 314(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 11743721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. mILD: a tool for constructing and analyzing matrices of pairwise phylogenetic character incongruence tests.
Planet PJ; Sarkar IN
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(24):4423-4. PubMed ID: 16267088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ortholog conjecture is untestable by the current gene ontology but is supported by RNA sequencing data.
Chen X; Zhang J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(11):e1002784. PubMed ID: 23209392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A universal genomic coordinate translator for comparative genomics.
Zamani N; Sundström G; Meadows JR; Höppner MP; Dainat J; Lantz H; Haas BJ; Grabherr MG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 15():227. PubMed ID: 24976580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MapGL: inferring evolutionary gain and loss of short genomic sequence features by phylogenetic maximum parsimony.
Diehl AG; Boyle AP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(1):416. PubMed ID: 32962625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multilevel comparative bioinformatics to investigate evolutionary relationships and specificities in gene annotations: an example for tomato and grapevine.
Ambrosino L; Ruggieri V; Bostan H; Miralto M; Vitulo N; Zouine M; Barone A; Bouzayen M; Frusciante L; Pezzotti M; Valle G; Chiusano ML
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(Suppl 15):435. PubMed ID: 30497367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the specificity of high-throughput ortholog prediction.
Fulton DL; Li YY; Laird MR; Horsman BG; Roche FM; Brinkman FS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():270. PubMed ID: 16729895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolutionary genomics and adaptive evolution of the Hedgehog gene family (Shh, Ihh and Dhh) in vertebrates.
Pereira J; Johnson WE; O'Brien SJ; Jarvis ED; Zhang G; Gilbert MT; Vasconcelos V; Antunes A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e74132. PubMed ID: 25549322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening synteny blocks in pairwise genome comparisons through integer programming.
Tang H; Lyons E; Pedersen B; Schnable JC; Paterson AH; Freeling M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Apr; 12():102. PubMed ID: 21501495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MultiMSOAR 2.0: an accurate tool to identify ortholog groups among multiple genomes.
Shi G; Peng MC; Jiang T
PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e20892. PubMed ID: 21712981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative methods for the analysis of gene-expression evolution: an example using yeast functional genomic data.
Oakley TH; Gu Z; Abouheif E; Patel NH; Li WH
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 15356281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A unified nomenclature for vertebrate olfactory receptors.
Olender T; Jones TEM; Bruford E; Lancet D
BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 32295537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data.
Hulsen T; Huynen MA; de Vlieg J; Groenen PM
Genome Biol; 2006; 7(4):R31. PubMed ID: 16613613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Genomic Survey of Angiotensin-Converting Enzymes Provides Novel Insights into Their Molecular Evolution in Vertebrates.
Lv Y; Li Y; Yi Y; Zhang L; Shi Q; Yang J
Molecules; 2018 Nov; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 30423933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ensembl comparative genomics resources.
Herrero J; Muffato M; Beal K; Fitzgerald S; Gordon L; Pignatelli M; Vilella AJ; Searle SM; Amode R; Brent S; Spooner W; Kulesha E; Yates A; Flicek P
Database (Oxford); 2016; 2016():. PubMed ID: 26896847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subtree power analysis and species selection for comparative genomics.
McAuliffe JD; Jordan MI; Pachter L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 May; 102(22):7900-5. PubMed ID: 15911755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated ortholog inference from phylogenetic trees and calculation of orthology reliability.
Storm CE; Sonnhammer EL
Bioinformatics; 2002 Jan; 18(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 11836216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
