These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29302756)

  • 1. Methanogens: biochemical background and biotechnological applications.
    Enzmann F; Mayer F; Rother M; Holtmann D
    AMB Express; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1. PubMed ID: 29302756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of different methanogenic species for the microbial electrosynthesis of methane from carbon dioxide.
    Mayer F; Enzmann F; Lopez AM; Holtmann D
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Oct; 289():121706. PubMed ID: 31279320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydrogen-driven microbial biogas upgrading: Advances, challenges and solutions.
    Lai CY; Zhou L; Yuan Z; Guo J
    Water Res; 2021 Jun; 197():117120. PubMed ID: 33862393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioelectrochemical Power-to-Gas: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.
    Geppert F; Liu D; van Eerten-Jansen M; Weidner E; Buisman C; Ter Heijne A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2016 Nov; 34(11):879-894. PubMed ID: 27666730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A metabolic quotient for methanogenic Archaea.
    Munk B; Bauer C; Gronauer A; Lebuhn M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(11):2311-7. PubMed ID: 23032759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explore the difference between the single-chamber and dual-chamber microbial electrosynthesis for biogas production performance.
    Wang H; Du H; Zeng S; Pan X; Cheng H; Liu L; Luo F
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Apr; 138():107726. PubMed ID: 33421897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation of a microbial community to demand-oriented biological methanation.
    Khesali Aghtaei H; Püttker S; Maus I; Heyer R; Huang L; Sczyrba A; Reichl U; Benndorf D
    Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod; 2022 Nov; 15(1):125. PubMed ID: 36384582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early response of methanogenic archaea to H
    Kakuk B; Wirth R; Maróti G; Szuhaj M; Rakhely G; Laczi K; Kovács KL; Bagi Z
    Microb Cell Fact; 2021 Jul; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 34217274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioconversion of carbon dioxide to methane using hydrogen and hydrogenotrophic methanogens.
    Zabranska J; Pokorna D
    Biotechnol Adv; 2018; 36(3):707-720. PubMed ID: 29248685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alamethicin suppresses methanogenesis and promotes acetogenesis in bioelectrochemical systems.
    Zhu X; Siegert M; Yates MD; Logan BE
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 81(11):3863-8. PubMed ID: 25819972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biologically Produced Methane as a Renewable Energy Source.
    Holmes DE; Smith JA
    Adv Appl Microbiol; 2016; 97():1-61. PubMed ID: 27926429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of H
    Wahid R; Mulat DG; Gaby JC; Horn SJ
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2019; 12():104. PubMed ID: 31164923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppressing Methane Production to Boost High-Purity Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
    He K; Li W; Tang L; Li W; Lv S; Xing D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 56(17):11931-11951. PubMed ID: 35969804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CO
    Yin X; Wu W; Maeke M; Richter-Heitmann T; Kulkarni AC; Oni OE; Wendt J; Elvert M; Friedrich MW
    ISME J; 2019 Aug; 13(8):2107-2119. PubMed ID: 31040382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review on microbial diversity and genetic markers involved in methanogenic degradation of hydrocarbons: futuristic prospects of biofuel recovery from contaminated regions.
    Sengupta K; Pal S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(30):40288-40307. PubMed ID: 33844144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methanogenesis in thermophilic biogas reactors.
    Ahring BK
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1995; 67(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 7741531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diversity of methanogenic archaea in a biogas reactor fed with swine feces as the mono-substrate by mcrA analysis.
    Zhu C; Zhang J; Tang Y; Zhengkai X; Song R
    Microbiol Res; 2011 Jan; 166(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 20116227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surpassing the current limitations of high purity H
    Kadier A; Kalil MS; Chandrasekhar K; Mohanakrishna G; Saratale GD; Saratale RG; Kumar G; Pugazhendhi A; Sivagurunathan P
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Feb; 119():211-219. PubMed ID: 29073521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.